PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRIRX vs. JQC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRIRX vs. JQC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Large Cap Growth Index Fund Retirement Class (TRIRX) and Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRIRX achieves a 8.86% return, which is significantly higher than JQC's 0.73% return. Over the past 10 years, TRIRX has outperformed JQC with an annualized return of 18.42%, while JQC has yielded a comparatively lower 5.78% annualized return.


TRIRX

1D
0.72%
1M
7.23%
YTD
8.86%
6M
8.03%
1Y
28.30%
3Y*
25.34%
5Y*
15.60%
10Y*
18.42%

JQC

1D
-0.83%
1M
1.03%
YTD
0.73%
6M
0.62%
1Y
2.31%
3Y*
11.73%
5Y*
4.75%
10Y*
5.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRIRX vs. JQC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRIRX
Nuveen Large Cap Growth Index Fund Retirement Class
8.86%18.13%32.98%42.30%-29.41%27.32%38.06%35.98%-1.91%28.50%
JQC
Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund
0.73%-0.36%22.29%15.26%-14.22%13.29%-2.96%21.78%-4.33%-0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between TRIRX and JQC is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2003

0.37

The correlation between TRIRX and JQC shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRIRX vs. JQC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRIRX
TRIRX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
TRIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
TRIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

JQC
JQC Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
JQC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JQC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
JQC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
JQC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
JQC Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRIRX vs. JQC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Large Cap Growth Index Fund Retirement Class (TRIRX) and Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRIRXJQCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.90

0.21

+1.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.56

0.38

+2.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.05

+0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

0.23

+1.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.04

0.46

+5.58

TRIRX vs. JQC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRIRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the JQC Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRIRX and JQC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRIRXJQCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

0.21

+1.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.36

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.33

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.23

+0.41

Drawdowns

TRIRX vs. JQC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRIRX drawdown since its inception was -51.49%, smaller than the maximum JQC drawdown of -75.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRIRX and JQC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRIRXJQCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.49%

-75.18%

+23.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.32%

-10.15%

-6.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.38%

-15.37%

-8.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.82%

-19.83%

-12.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.82%

-47.99%

+15.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.34%

+5.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.90%

-8.82%

+1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.88%

5.04%

-0.16%

Volatility

TRIRX vs. JQC - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Large Cap Growth Index Fund Retirement Class (TRIRX) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC) at 2.16%. This indicates that TRIRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JQC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRIRXJQCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

2.16%

+1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.62%

8.80%

+2.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.45%

11.11%

+4.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.48%

13.17%

+8.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.09%

17.56%

+3.53%

TRIRX vs. JQC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRIRX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than JQC's 4.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRIRX vs. JQC - Dividend Comparison

TRIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than JQC's 13.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JQC
Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund
13.22%12.91%11.39%11.42%9.71%10.03%16.11%16.14%6.53%7.42%6.99%7.51%
TRIRX
Nuveen Large Cap Growth Index Fund Retirement Class
3.81%4.15%3.00%1.67%10.58%8.44%1.69%2.13%3.69%0.68%1.09%1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRIRX and JQC have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRIRX has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to JQC (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRIRX dropped -51.49% vs JQC's -75.18%.

TRIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRIRX and JQC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer