TRIP.L vs. RMAU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (TRIP.L) and The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities (RMAU.L).
TRIP.L and RMAU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TRIP.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Jun 4, 2021. RMAU.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Dec 2, 2020. Both TRIP.L and RMAU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
TRIP.L vs. RMAU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRIP.L vs. RMAU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRIP.L HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF | -8.11% | 10.16% | 28.46% | 23.58% | -9.55% | -36.44% |
RMAU.L The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities | 10.45% | 52.84% | 28.16% | 7.63% | 11.68% | 0.32% |
Different Trading Currencies
TRIP.L is traded in GBp, while RMAU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RMAU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRIP.L achieves a -8.11% return, which is significantly lower than RMAU.L's 12.56% return.
TRIP.L
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -2.11%
- YTD
- -8.11%
- 6M
- 1.34%
- 1Y
- 17.55%
- 3Y*
- 13.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RMAU.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.91%
- YTD
- 12.56%
- 6M
- 25.99%
- 1Y
- 49.40%
- 3Y*
- 30.67%
- 5Y*
- 23.45%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRIP.L vs. RMAU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRIP.L has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than RMAU.L's 0.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRIP.L vs. RMAU.L — Risk / Return Rank
TRIP.L
RMAU.L
TRIP.L vs. RMAU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (TRIP.L) and The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities (RMAU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRIP.L | RMAU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.36 | 1.98 | -1.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.94 | 2.42 | -1.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.38 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 2.81 | -1.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.64 | 11.58 | -9.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRIP.L | RMAU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | 1.98 | -1.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 0.90 | -0.94 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRIP.L and RMAU.L is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
TRIP.L vs. RMAU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither TRIP.L nor RMAU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
TRIP.L vs. RMAU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRIP.L drawdown since its inception was -48.20%, which is greater than RMAU.L's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRIP.L and RMAU.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRIP.L | RMAU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.20% | -21.56% | -26.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.65% | -18.15% | -10.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.58% | -12.13% | -14.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.65% | -6.93% | -22.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.65% | 4.64% | +11.01% |
Volatility
TRIP.L vs. RMAU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (TRIP.L) is 7.58%, while The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities (RMAU.L) has a volatility of 12.75%. This indicates that TRIP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMAU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRIP.L | RMAU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.58% | 12.75% | -5.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.13% | 21.98% | +22.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.59% | 24.84% | +23.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.92% | 16.83% | +23.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.92% | 20.75% | +19.17% |