TRIP.L vs. XLPS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (TRIP.L) and Invesco Consumer Staples S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLPS.L).
TRIP.L and XLPS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TRIP.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Jun 4, 2021. XLPS.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Consumer Staples Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. Both TRIP.L and XLPS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
TRIP.L vs. XLPS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRIP.L vs. XLPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRIP.L HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF | -7.05% | 10.16% | 28.46% | 23.58% | -9.55% | -36.44% |
XLPS.L Invesco Consumer Staples S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 8.08% | -3.42% | 16.25% | -5.24% | 11.70% | 15.26% |
Different Trading Currencies
TRIP.L is traded in GBp, while XLPS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLPS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRIP.L achieves a -7.05% return, which is significantly lower than XLPS.L's 8.08% return.
TRIP.L
- 1D
- 3.64%
- 1M
- -3.10%
- YTD
- -7.05%
- 6M
- 2.62%
- 1Y
- 19.54%
- 3Y*
- 13.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLPS.L
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -6.04%
- YTD
- 8.08%
- 6M
- 9.02%
- 1Y
- 2.30%
- 3Y*
- 5.34%
- 5Y*
- 8.80%
- 10Y*
- 8.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRIP.L vs. XLPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRIP.L has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than XLPS.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRIP.L vs. XLPS.L — Risk / Return Rank
TRIP.L
XLPS.L
TRIP.L vs. XLPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (TRIP.L) and Invesco Consumer Staples S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRIP.L | XLPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 0.16 | +0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.00 | 0.32 | +0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.04 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | 0.34 | +0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.21 | 0.70 | +0.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRIP.L | XLPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 0.16 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | 0.82 | -0.86 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRIP.L and XLPS.L is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TRIP.L vs. XLPS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither TRIP.L nor XLPS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
TRIP.L vs. XLPS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRIP.L drawdown since its inception was -48.20%, which is greater than XLPS.L's maximum drawdown of -18.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRIP.L and XLPS.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRIP.L | XLPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.20% | -23.98% | -24.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.65% | -8.94% | -19.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.73% | -8.13% | -17.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.66% | -3.68% | -25.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.57% | 3.77% | +11.80% |
Volatility
TRIP.L vs. XLPS.L - Volatility Comparison
HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (TRIP.L) has a higher volatility of 7.98% compared to Invesco Consumer Staples S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLPS.L) at 5.59%. This indicates that TRIP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRIP.L | XLPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.98% | 5.59% | +2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.12% | 10.76% | +33.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.58% | 14.66% | +33.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.93% | 13.75% | +26.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.93% | 15.04% | +24.89% |