RMAU.L vs. SPOG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities (RMAU.L) and iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (SPOG.L).
RMAU.L and SPOG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RMAU.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Dec 2, 2020. SPOG.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. It was launched on Sep 16, 2011. Both RMAU.L and SPOG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
RMAU.L vs. SPOG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMAU.L vs. SPOG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMAU.L The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities | 10.73% | 64.57% | 25.96% | 13.29% | -0.19% | -4.14% | 14.46% |
SPOG.L iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF | 32.36% | 6.60% | -1.10% | 2.22% | 37.90% | 67.83% | -23.09% |
Different Trading Currencies
RMAU.L is traded in USD, while SPOG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SPOG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMAU.L achieves a 10.73% return, which is significantly lower than SPOG.L's 32.36% return.
RMAU.L
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -10.26%
- YTD
- 10.73%
- 6M
- 23.46%
- 1Y
- 51.91%
- 3Y*
- 33.78%
- 5Y*
- 22.41%
- 10Y*
- —
SPOG.L
- 1D
- -5.18%
- 1M
- 8.35%
- YTD
- 32.36%
- 6M
- 35.57%
- 1Y
- 31.91%
- 3Y*
- 15.75%
- 5Y*
- 20.15%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMAU.L vs. SPOG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMAU.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than SPOG.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMAU.L vs. SPOG.L — Risk / Return Rank
RMAU.L
SPOG.L
RMAU.L vs. SPOG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities (RMAU.L) and iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (SPOG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMAU.L | SPOG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.98 | 1.15 | +0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.45 | 1.55 | +0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.22 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 1.92 | +0.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.41 | 5.64 | +5.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMAU.L | SPOG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 1.15 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.31 | 0.67 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.12 | +0.78 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMAU.L and SPOG.L is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RMAU.L vs. SPOG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither RMAU.L nor SPOG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
RMAU.L vs. SPOG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMAU.L drawdown since its inception was -21.56%, smaller than the maximum SPOG.L drawdown of -83.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMAU.L and SPOG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMAU.L | SPOG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.56% | -76.49% | +54.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.15% | -20.37% | +2.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.17% | -32.90% | +11.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -71.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.26% | -6.52% | -3.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.93% | -26.68% | +19.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.59% | 5.58% | -0.99% |
Volatility
RMAU.L vs. SPOG.L - Volatility Comparison
The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities (RMAU.L) has a higher volatility of 11.85% compared to iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (SPOG.L) at 11.25%. This indicates that RMAU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPOG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMAU.L | SPOG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.85% | 11.25% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.30% | 18.49% | +3.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.13% | 27.56% | -1.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.37% | 30.21% | -12.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.35% | 32.80% | -11.45% |