TRIP.L vs. CSTP.L
TRIP.L (HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF) and CSTP.L (State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - TRIP.L tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR while CSTP.L tracks the MSCI Europe Consumer Staples 35/20 Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TRIP.L returned 9.09%/yr vs 2.01%/yr for CSTP.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TRIP.L charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for CSTP.L.
Performance
TRIP.L vs. CSTP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TRIP.L is traded in GBp, while CSTP.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CSTP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRIP.L achieves a -0.51% return, which is significantly lower than CSTP.L's 5.20% return.
TRIP.L
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -2.92%
- 6M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 1Y
- 9.00%
- 3Y*
- 12.73%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- —
CSTP.L
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- 6M
- 5.57%
- YTD
- 5.20%
- 1Y
- 8.63%
- 3Y*
- 2.72%
- 5Y*
- 2.01%
- 10Y*
- 3.81%
TRIP.L vs. CSTP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRIP.L HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF | -0.51% | 10.16% | 28.46% | 23.58% | -9.55% | -36.44% |
CSTP.L State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF | 5.20% | 12.89% | -6.80% | -1.33% | -3.12% | 7.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRIP.L and CSTP.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2021 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRIP.L vs. CSTP.L — Risk / Return Rank
TRIP.L
CSTP.L
TRIP.L vs. CSTP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (TRIP.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (CSTP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRIP.L | CSTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.12 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.45 | 1.37 | +0.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRIP.L vs. CSTP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRIP.L drawdown since its inception was -48.20%, which is greater than CSTP.L's maximum drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRIP.L and CSTP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRIP.L | CSTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.20% | -23.51% | -24.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.01% | -13.44% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.93% | -13.44% | -15.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.93% | -17.87% | -11.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.93% | -5.08% | -2.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.03% | -6.56% | -20.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.20% | 6.31% | -0.11% |
Volatility
TRIP.L vs. CSTP.L - Volatility Comparison
HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (TRIP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (CSTP.L) at 5.51%. This indicates that TRIP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSTP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRIP.L | CSTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.40% | 5.51% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.06% | 11.91% | +7.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.34% | 14.38% | +7.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.84% | 13.14% | +14.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.33% | 13.96% | +16.37% |
TRIP.L vs. CSTP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRIP.L has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than CSTP.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRIP.L vs. CSTP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither TRIP.L nor CSTP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TRIP.L and CSTP.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSTP.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSTP.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for TRIP.L.
TRIP.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while CSTP.L tracks MSCI Europe Consumer Staples 35/20 Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TRIP.L and 0.18% for CSTP.L.
Find the right allocation for TRIP.L and CSTP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer