TRI.TO vs. HTA.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TRI.TO (Thomson Reuters Corporation) is a stock, while HTA.TO (Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Harvest. Over the past 10 years, TRI.TO returned 10.20%/yr vs 20.58%/yr for HTA.TO. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TRI.TO vs. HTA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI.TO) and Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF (HTA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRI.TO achieves a -36.52% return, which is significantly lower than HTA.TO's 26.21% return. Over the past 10 years, TRI.TO has underperformed HTA.TO with an annualized return of 10.20%, while HTA.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.58% annualized return.

TRI.TO

• 1D: -2.93%
• 1M: -11.18%
• YTD: -36.52%
• 6M: -38.67%
• 1Y: -56.64%
• 3Y*: -9.41%
• 5Y*: 1.37%
• 10Y*: 10.20%

HTA.TO

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: 16.27%
• YTD: 26.21%
• 6M: 26.86%
• 1Y: 44.88%
• 3Y*: 26.62%
• 5Y*: 17.70%
• 10Y*: 20.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRI.TO vs. HTA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TRI.TO Thomson Reuters Corporation	-36.52%	-20.40%	20.71%	31.99%	3.83%	47.48%	14.40%	44.06%	23.99%	-3.89%
HTA.TO Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF	26.21%	12.42%	23.53%	52.86%	-32.21%	42.59%	30.02%	32.48%	-0.73%	34.20%

Correlation

The correlation between TRI.TO and HTA.TO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2015	0.31

Over the past year, the correlation between TRI.TO and HTA.TO has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

TRI.TO vs. HTA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRI.TO

TRI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3
TRI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
TRI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
TRI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2
TRI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
TRI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7

HTA.TO

HTA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 67
HTA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
HTA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
HTA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 68
HTA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
HTA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRI.TO vs. HTA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI.TO) and Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF (HTA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRI.TO	HTA.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.37	2.52	-3.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.33	3.25	-5.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.70	1.41	-0.71
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.90	3.03	-3.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.44	10.32	-11.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRI.TO vs. HTA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRI.TO Sharpe Ratio is -1.37, which is lower than the HTA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRI.TO and HTA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRI.TO	HTA.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.37	2.52	-3.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06	0.76	-0.70
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	0.90	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.74	-0.39

Drawdowns

TRI.TO vs. HTA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRI.TO drawdown since its inception was -63.01%, which is greater than HTA.TO's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRI.TO and HTA.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRI.TO	HTA.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.01%	-38.77%	-24.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-63.01%	-14.87%	-48.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-63.01%	-25.02%	-37.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.01%	-38.77%	-24.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.01%	-38.77%	-24.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-60.53%	-0.94%	-59.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.72%	-8.23%	-5.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	39.49%	4.36%	+35.13%

Volatility

TRI.TO vs. HTA.TO - Volatility Comparison

Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI.TO) has a higher volatility of 17.85% compared to Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF (HTA.TO) at 5.64%. This indicates that TRI.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRI.TO	HTA.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.85%	5.64%	+12.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.57%	14.56%	+22.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.57%	17.91%	+23.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.95%	23.53%	+1.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.75%	23.08%	-0.33%

Dividends

TRI.TO vs. HTA.TO - Dividend Comparison

TRI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than HTA.TO's 7.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HTA.TO Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF	7.70%	8.80%	8.11%	7.81%	9.99%	4.27%	5.52%	6.12%	7.58%	7.03%	8.74%	5.29%
TRI.TO Thomson Reuters Corporation	2.20%	1.81%	1.26%	4.48%	1.47%	1.32%	1.92%	2.04%	11.78%	3.24%	3.02%	3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRI.TO and HTA.TO in my portfolio?

TRI.TO and HTA.TO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.