TRI.TO vs. SPGI

In the year-to-date period, TRI.TO achieves a 18.28% return, which is significantly higher than SPGI's 3.61% return. Over the past 10 years, TRI.TO has outperformed SPGI with an annualized return of 21.52%, while SPGI has yielded a comparatively lower 18.51% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI.TO) and S&P Global Inc. (SPGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current TRI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the SPGI Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRI.TO and SPGI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

TRI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than SPGI's 0.73% yield.

The maximum TRI.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.57%, smaller than the maximum SPGI drawdown of -74.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRI.TO and SPGI.

The current volatility for Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI.TO) is 4.51%, while S&P Global Inc. (SPGI) has a volatility of 4.81%. This indicates that TRI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Thomson Reuters Corporation and S&P Global Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.