TRFM vs. TRUT
TRFM (AAM Transformers ETF) and TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. TRFM is passively managed, while TRUT is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TRFM charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for TRUT.
Performance
TRFM vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRFM achieves a 23.78% return, which is significantly higher than TRUT's 16.06% return.
TRFM
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- 6M
- 18.96%
- YTD
- 23.78%
- 1Y
- 36.82%
- 3Y*
- 26.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 24.50%
TRUT
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- 6M
- 17.81%
- YTD
- 16.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.70M | $2.28M | $2.00M | |
| $14.69M | $9.27M | $6.33M |
TRFM vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TRFM AAM Transformers ETF | 23.78% | 9.52% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 16.06% | 9.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRFM and TRUT is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRFM vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank
TRFM
TRUT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TRFM vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Transformers ETF (TRFM) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRFM | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.14 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRFM vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRFM drawdown since its inception was -28.40%, which is greater than TRUT's maximum drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRFM and TRUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRFM | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.40% | -18.55% | -9.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.63% | -8.73% | +2.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.56% | -5.75% | -0.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.54% | — | — |
Volatility
TRFM vs. TRUT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRFM | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.91% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.73% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.59% | 23.81% | +1.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.27% | 23.81% | +3.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.27% | 23.81% | +3.46% |
TRFM vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRFM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRFM vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison
TRFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than TRUT's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
TRFM AAM Transformers ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 0.31% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRFM and TRUT have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for TRFM.
TRUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.14% for TRFM.
They also come from different issuers: AAM and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for TRFM and 0.13% for TRUT.
Find the right allocation for TRFM and TRUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer