PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRFM vs. KROP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TRFM vs. KROP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM Transformers ETF (TRFM) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TRFM vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TRFM
AAM Transformers ETF
-0.59%25.76%19.96%44.71%-7.38%
KROP
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF
15.06%7.95%-8.74%-23.86%-11.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRFM achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly lower than KROP's 15.06% return.


TRFM

1D
1.97%
1M
-4.51%
YTD
-0.59%
6M
-2.92%
1Y
36.00%
3Y*
21.84%
5Y*
10Y*

KROP

1D
0.91%
1M
-4.77%
YTD
15.06%
6M
15.34%
1Y
18.33%
3Y*
-5.23%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TRFM vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRFM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TRFM vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRFM
TRFM Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
TRFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRFM Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
TRFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRFM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

KROP
KROP Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRFM vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Transformers ETF (TRFM) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRFMKROPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.28

0.96

+0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.87

1.41

+0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.19

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

1.78

+0.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.73

4.21

+4.53

TRFM vs. KROP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRFM Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the KROP Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRFM and KROP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRFMKROPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

0.96

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

-0.60

+1.36

Correlation

The correlation between TRFM and KROP is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

TRFM vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison

TRFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than KROP's 2.37% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
TRFM
AAM Transformers ETF
0.17%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KROP
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF
2.37%2.73%1.89%1.36%0.71%0.69%

Drawdowns

TRFM vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRFM drawdown since its inception was -28.40%, smaller than the maximum KROP drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRFM and KROP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TRFMKROPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.40%

-61.96%

+33.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.15%

-11.29%

-3.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.17%

-49.60%

+42.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.86%

-44.32%

+37.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

4.78%

-0.49%

Volatility

TRFM vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison

AAM Transformers ETF (TRFM) has a higher volatility of 9.47% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) at 5.19%. This indicates that TRFM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TRFMKROPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.47%

5.19%

+4.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.88%

12.34%

+5.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.31%

19.33%

+8.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.05%

22.43%

+4.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.05%

22.43%

+4.62%