TRFK vs. TSXU
TRFK (Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - TRFK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRFK charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
TRFK vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRFK achieves a 64.96% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 126.91% return.
TRFK
- 1D
- -2.93%
- 1M
- 24.68%
- YTD
- 64.96%
- 6M
- 57.34%
- 1Y
- 97.75%
- 3Y*
- 52.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSXU
- 1D
- -6.20%
- 1M
- 47.27%
- YTD
- 126.91%
- 6M
- 118.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRFK vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF | 64.96% | -6.25% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 126.91% | 13.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRFK and TSXU is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRFK vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
TRFK
TSXU
TRFK vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRFK | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.03 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.06 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRFK | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.54 | 3.95 | -2.41 |
Drawdowns
TRFK vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRFK drawdown since its inception was -29.06%, smaller than the maximum TSXU drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRFK and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRFK | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.06% | -35.62% | +6.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.99% | -7.07% | +4.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.04% | -10.54% | +4.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.13% | — | — |
Volatility
TRFK vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRFK | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.70% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.98% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.82% | 78.90% | -51.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.94% | 78.90% | -49.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.94% | 78.90% | -49.96% |
TRFK vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRFK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRFK vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
TRFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than TSXU's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 0.20% | 0.56% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.28% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRFK and TSXU have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRFK is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRFK is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.01% for TRFK.
TRFK is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. TRFK tracks Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net, while TSXU tracks Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TRFK and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for TRFK and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer