PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRFK vs. PTLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TRFK vs. PTLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TRFK vs. PTLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TRFK
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF
-0.86%26.81%38.30%66.63%-10.61%
PTLC
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF
-5.31%5.10%24.31%16.78%1.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRFK achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly higher than PTLC's -5.31% return.


TRFK

1D
2.04%
1M
0.36%
YTD
-0.86%
6M
-7.06%
1Y
41.36%
3Y*
33.58%
5Y*
10Y*

PTLC

1D
0.32%
1M
-5.90%
YTD
-5.31%
6M
-3.30%
1Y
3.31%
3Y*
12.47%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
10.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TRFK vs. PTLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TRFK and PTLC have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Return for Risk

TRFK vs. PTLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRFK
TRFK Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
TRFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRFK Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TRFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRFK Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

PTLC
PTLC Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PTLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTLC Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
PTLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTLC Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRFK vs. PTLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRFKPTLCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

0.29

+1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.95

0.45

+1.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.06

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

0.38

+1.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.21

1.02

+4.19

TRFK vs. PTLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRFK Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the PTLC Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRFK and PTLC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRFKPTLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

0.29

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.63

+0.37

Correlation

The correlation between TRFK and PTLC is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

TRFK vs. PTLC - Dividend Comparison

TRFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than PTLC's 1.12% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TRFK
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF
0.01%0.01%0.40%0.20%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PTLC
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF
1.12%1.06%0.67%1.18%1.26%0.73%1.08%1.10%1.00%0.97%1.08%0.42%

Drawdowns

TRFK vs. PTLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRFK drawdown since its inception was -29.06%, which is greater than PTLC's maximum drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRFK and PTLC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TRFKPTLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.06%

-26.63%

-2.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.56%

-8.77%

-10.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.05%

-7.15%

-6.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-5.70%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.21%

3.31%

+4.90%

Volatility

TRFK vs. PTLC - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) has a higher volatility of 9.87% compared to Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) at 4.58%. This indicates that TRFK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TRFKPTLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.87%

4.58%

+5.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.60%

9.15%

+11.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.56%

11.59%

+19.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.63%

11.79%

+16.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.63%

13.17%

+15.46%