TRFK vs. AIS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TRFK (Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF) and AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. TRFK is passively managed, while AIS is actively managed. Over the past year, TRFK returned 97.75% vs 213.72% for AIS. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRFK charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AIS.

Performance

TRFK vs. AIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRFK achieves a 64.96% return, which is significantly lower than AIS's 112.47% return.

TRFK

• 1D: -2.93%
• 1M: 24.68%
• YTD: 64.96%
• 6M: 57.34%
• 1Y: 97.75%
• 3Y*: 52.66%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AIS

• 1D: -2.81%
• 1M: 25.92%
• YTD: 112.47%
• 6M: 116.72%
• 1Y: 213.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRFK vs. AIS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF	64.96%	26.81%	-1.88%
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	112.47%	58.35%	-4.92%

Correlation

The correlation between TRFK and AIS is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024	0.88

The correlation between TRFK and AIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

TRFK vs. AIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TRFK	AIS
Technology	91.8%	84.6%
Industrials	8.3%	8.9%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-0.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	3.2%

Return for Risk

TRFK vs. AIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRFK

TRFK Risk / Return Rank: 85
TRFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
TRFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
TRFK Omega Ratio Rank: 86
TRFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
TRFK Martin Ratio Rank: 67

AIS

AIS Risk / Return Rank: 97
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRFK vs. AIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRFK	AIS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.53	5.96	-2.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.15	5.55	-1.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.76	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.03	13.58	-8.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.06	44.68	-32.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRFK vs. AIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRFK Sharpe Ratio is 3.53, which is lower than the AIS Sharpe Ratio of 5.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRFK and AIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRFK	AIS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.53	5.96	-2.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.54	3.11	-1.57

Drawdowns

TRFK vs. AIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRFK drawdown since its inception was -29.06%, smaller than the maximum AIS drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRFK and AIS.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRFK	AIS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.06%	-32.78%	+3.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.56%	-15.84%	-3.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.99%	-2.81%	-0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.04%	-5.44%	-0.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.13%	4.81%	+3.32%

Volatility

TRFK vs. AIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) is 10.70%, while VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) has a volatility of 16.28%. This indicates that TRFK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRFK	AIS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.70%	16.28%	-5.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.98%	30.16%	-8.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.82%	36.13%	-8.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.94%	38.08%	-9.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.94%	38.08%	-9.14%

TRFK vs. AIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRFK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than AIS's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRFK vs. AIS - Dividend Comparison

TRFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while AIS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.40%	0.20%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRFK and AIS in my portfolio?

TRFK and AIS have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TRFK or AIS?

AIS has higher volatility (16.28%) compared to TRFK (10.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRFK dropped -29.06% vs AIS's -32.78%.

Which ETF is better, TRFK or AIS?

On 1-year performance, AIS leads with 213.72% vs 97.75% for TRFK. On fees, TRFK is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, TRFK has been the lower-risk option at 10.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TRFK or AIS?

Over the 1-year period, AIS has performed better with a 213.72% return vs 97.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TRFK or AIS?

TRFK is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TRFK or AIS?

TRFK has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for AIS.

What is the main difference between TRFK and AIS?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TRFK and 0.75% for AIS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.96 vs 3.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.