TREX.L vs. CEMB
TREX.L (Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF Dist) and CEMB (iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TREX.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index, while CEMB is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the JP Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TREX.L returned -1.05%/yr vs 1.92%/yr for CEMB. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TREX.L charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CEMB.
Performance
TREX.L vs. CEMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TREX.L achieves a -0.74% return, which is significantly lower than CEMB's 1.54% return.
TREX.L
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- -0.74%
- 6M
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- 4.21%
- 3Y*
- 2.99%
- 5Y*
- -1.05%
- 10Y*
- —
CEMB
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 6.95%
- 3Y*
- 7.15%
- 5Y*
- 1.92%
- 10Y*
- 3.55%
TREX.L vs. CEMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TREX.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF Dist | -0.74% | 8.41% | -0.22% | 3.58% | -14.94% | -3.02% | 9.76% | 8.50% |
CEMB iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF | 1.54% | 8.86% | 5.81% | 8.37% | -12.58% | -0.59% | 6.77% | 12.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between TREX.L and CEMB is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2019 | 0.39 |
The correlation between TREX.L and CEMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.58 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TREX.L vs. CEMB — Risk / Return Rank
TREX.L
CEMB
TREX.L vs. CEMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TREX.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TREX.L | CEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.42 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 2.31 | -1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.81 | 9.95 | -7.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TREX.L vs. CEMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TREX.L drawdown since its inception was -23.38%, which is greater than CEMB's maximum drawdown of -20.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TREX.L and CEMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TREX.L | CEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.38% | -20.84% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.96% | -2.88% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.42% | -3.85% | -3.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.96% | -20.48% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.23% | -0.20% | -10.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.96% | -3.65% | -6.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.36% | 0.67% | +0.69% |
Volatility
TREX.L vs. CEMB - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TREX.L) has a higher volatility of 1.82% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB) at 1.20%. This indicates that TREX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TREX.L | CEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.82% | 1.20% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.34% | 2.50% | +0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.50% | 3.11% | +1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.49% | 5.64% | +1.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.93% | 6.29% | +0.64% |
TREX.L vs. CEMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
TREX.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMB's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TREX.L vs. CEMB - Dividend Comparison
TREX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, less than CEMB's 5.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMB iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF | 5.13% | 5.14% | 5.11% | 4.77% | 4.29% | 3.51% | 3.86% | 4.19% | 4.66% | 4.06% | 4.26% | 4.76% |
TREX.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF Dist | 4.33% | 4.23% | 4.34% | 3.48% | 2.41% | 1.63% | 1.81% | 2.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TREX.L and CEMB have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TREX.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TREX.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CEMB.
TREX.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while CEMB is Corporate Bonds. TREX.L tracks Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index, while CEMB tracks JP Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for TREX.L and 0.50% for CEMB.
Find the right allocation for TREX.L and CEMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer