PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRES.L vs. TRXG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRES.L vs. TRXG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRES.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRXG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TRES.L is traded in USD, while TRXG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the TRXG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRES.L achieves a -0.30% return, which is significantly higher than TRXG.L's -0.87% return.


TRES.L

1D
0.18%
1M
0.17%
YTD
-0.30%
6M
0.09%
1Y
3.62%
3Y*
2.90%
5Y*
-0.37%
10Y*

TRXG.L

1D
0.28%
1M
0.13%
YTD
-0.87%
6M
-0.44%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
2.69%
5Y*
-0.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRES.L vs. TRXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TRES.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist
-0.30%6.57%0.75%3.82%-12.15%-2.44%8.00%5.79%
TRXG.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF Dist
-0.87%8.70%-0.26%3.00%-14.94%-2.69%9.33%7.95%

Correlation

The correlation between TRES.L and TRXG.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019

0.72

The correlation between TRES.L and TRXG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRES.L vs. TRXG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRES.L
TRES.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
TRES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
TRES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

TRXG.L
TRXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TRXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
TRXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRES.L vs. TRXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRES.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRES.LTRXG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.12

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

0.94

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.84

2.85

+0.99

TRES.L vs. TRXG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRES.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the TRXG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRES.L and TRXG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRES.LTRXG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

0.68

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

-0.11

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.14

+0.08

Drawdowns

TRES.L vs. TRXG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRES.L drawdown since its inception was -18.77%, smaller than the maximum TRXG.L drawdown of -23.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRES.L and TRXG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRES.LTRXG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.77%

-23.60%

+4.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-4.17%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.16%

-7.58%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.40%

-21.09%

+4.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.77%

-10.57%

+3.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.61%

-10.26%

+1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

1.38%

-0.44%

Volatility

TRES.L vs. TRXG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRES.L) is 1.36%, while Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRXG.L) has a volatility of 1.85%. This indicates that TRES.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRES.LTRXG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

1.85%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.75%

4.18%

-1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08%

5.80%

-1.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.73%

8.55%

-2.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.67%

8.56%

-2.89%

TRES.L vs. TRXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TRES.L and TRXG.L have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TRES.L vs. TRXG.L - Dividend Comparison

TRES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, which matches TRXG.L's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
TRES.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist
4.25%4.19%4.26%3.78%1.96%1.14%1.58%1.96%
TRXG.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF Dist
4.28%4.25%4.24%3.55%2.38%1.60%1.94%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRES.L and TRXG.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.06% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRES.L and TRXG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.06% per year.

TRES.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Index, while TRXG.L tracks Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRES.L and TRXG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer