PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TREI.L vs. XT01.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TREI.L vs. XT01.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TREI.L) and Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XT01.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TREI.L is traded in USD, while XT01.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XT01.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TREI.L having a 1.85% return and XT01.L slightly lower at 1.80%.


TREI.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
6M
1.70%
YTD
1.85%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.34%
10Y*

XT01.L

1D
0.02%
1M
1.05%
6M
1.74%
YTD
1.80%
1Y
3.79%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
3.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TREI.L vs. XT01.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TREI.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.85%4.31%5.17%4.98%0.53%-0.02%0.05%
XT01.L
Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C
1.80%4.54%5.13%4.49%0.82%0.44%1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between TREI.L and XT01.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2020

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TREI.L vs. XT01.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TREI.L
TREI.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TREI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TREI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
TREI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
TREI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
TREI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

XT01.L
XT01.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
XT01.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XT01.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XT01.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XT01.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XT01.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TREI.L vs. XT01.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TREI.L) and Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XT01.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TREI.LXT01.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+9.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.71

1.16

+3.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

13.21

2.94

+10.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

159.95

11.57

+148.38

TREI.L vs. XT01.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TREI.L Sharpe Ratio is 6.57, which is higher than the XT01.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TREI.L and XT01.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TREI.L vs. XT01.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TREI.L drawdown since its inception was -0.68%, smaller than the maximum XT01.L drawdown of -2.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TREI.L and XT01.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TREI.LXT01.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.68%

-2.42%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.29%

-1.28%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.29%

-1.28%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.67%

-2.42%

+1.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.38%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.06%

-0.48%

+0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

0.33%

-0.31%

Volatility

TREI.L vs. XT01.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TREI.L) is 0.11%, while Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XT01.L) has a volatility of 1.08%. This indicates that TREI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XT01.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TREI.LXT01.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.11%

1.08%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.50%

3.76%

-3.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59%

4.34%

-3.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.55%

4.77%

-4.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.56%

4.76%

-4.20%

TREI.L vs. XT01.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TREI.L and XT01.L have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TREI.L vs. XT01.L - Dividend Comparison

TREI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, while XT01.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
TREI.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
3.92%4.23%4.98%4.59%1.51%0.10%0.69%
XT01.L
Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TREI.L and XT01.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.06% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TREI.L and XT01.L have the same expense ratio: 0.06% per year.

TREI.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index, while XT01.L tracks FTSE US Treasury Short Duration Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TREI.L and XT01.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer