PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TREG.L vs. IDUP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TREG.L vs. IDUP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TREG.L) and iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDUP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TREG.L is traded in GBP, while IDUP.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IDUP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TREG.L achieves a 9.24% return, which is significantly lower than IDUP.L's 15.56% return. Over the past 10 years, TREG.L has underperformed IDUP.L with an annualized return of 1.89%, while IDUP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 3.90% annualized return.


TREG.L

1D
-0.81%
1M
0.83%
6M
7.74%
YTD
9.24%
1Y
15.17%
3Y*
9.86%
5Y*
3.20%
10Y*
1.89%

IDUP.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.94%
6M
13.74%
YTD
15.56%
1Y
17.06%
3Y*
8.23%
5Y*
3.59%
10Y*
3.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TREG.L vs. IDUP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TREG.L
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
9.24%6.64%2.78%7.62%-16.75%31.33%-10.05%3.51%-0.21%-4.12%
IDUP.L
iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
15.56%-5.06%6.56%7.39%-15.29%43.12%-13.53%16.77%0.82%-4.68%

Correlation

The correlation between TREG.L and IDUP.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2011

0.68

The correlation between TREG.L and IDUP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TREG.L vs. IDUP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TREG.L
TREG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
TREG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TREG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
TREG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
TREG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
TREG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

IDUP.L
IDUP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
IDUP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDUP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDUP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
IDUP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDUP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TREG.L vs. IDUP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TREG.L) and iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDUP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TREG.LIDUP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.23

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

2.69

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.07

6.25

-1.18

TREG.L vs. IDUP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TREG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the IDUP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TREG.L and IDUP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TREG.L vs. IDUP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TREG.L drawdown since its inception was -38.57%, smaller than the maximum IDUP.L drawdown of -59.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TREG.L and IDUP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TREG.LIDUP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.57%

-59.86%

+21.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-6.47%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.31%

-21.22%

+5.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.89%

-28.14%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.67%

-39.54%

+3.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

-3.63%

+1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.97%

-11.10%

+0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

2.79%

+0.20%

Volatility

TREG.L vs. IDUP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TREG.L) is 3.85%, while iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDUP.L) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that TREG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDUP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TREG.LIDUP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

4.56%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.85%

10.58%

-0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.73%

13.57%

-1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.77%

17.67%

-2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.01%

19.89%

-3.88%

TREG.L vs. IDUP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TREG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IDUP.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

TREG.L vs. IDUP.L - Dividend Comparison

TREG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than IDUP.L's 2.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDUP.L
iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.90%3.20%3.09%3.13%3.84%2.13%3.22%3.10%4.60%3.17%3.55%2.98%
TREG.L
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
3.34%3.57%3.48%3.64%4.54%1.82%4.49%3.41%3.83%2.79%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TREG.L and IDUP.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TREG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TREG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IDUP.L.

TREG.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while IDUP.L tracks iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TREG.L and 0.40% for IDUP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TREG.L and IDUP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer