PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TREG.L vs. HPRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TREG.L vs. HPRD.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TREG.L (VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) and HPRD.L (HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF) are both REIT funds tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, from VanEck and HSBC respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TREG.L returned 3.19%/yr vs 2.24%/yr for HPRD.L. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TREG.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for HPRD.L.

Performance

TREG.L vs. HPRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TREG.L) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TREG.L is traded in GBP, while HPRD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HPRD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TREG.L achieves a 2.95% return, which is significantly lower than HPRD.L's 6.86% return.

TREG.L

1D
-0.38%
1M
-3.10%
YTD
2.95%
6M
1.90%
1Y
10.15%
3Y*
7.67%
5Y*
3.19%
10Y*
—

HPRD.L

1D
0.34%
1M
-1.41%
YTD
6.86%
6M
6.41%
1Y
12.73%
3Y*
6.38%
5Y*
2.24%
10Y*
4.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TREG.L vs. HPRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TREG.L
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF		2.95%6.62%2.78%7.64%-16.77%31.33%-10.04%10.49%
HPRD.L
HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF		6.86%2.99%1.56%5.34%-15.81%27.62%-11.57%10.98%

Correlation

The correlation between TREG.L and HPRD.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2019

0.91

The correlation between TREG.L and HPRD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

TREG.L vs. HPRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
TREG.L
HPRD.L

Real Estate

98.4%
98.3%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
0.1%

Financial Services

0.0%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

0.3%

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

TREG.L
98.4%
HPRD.L
98.3%

Consumer Cyclical

TREG.L
0.1%
HPRD.L
0.1%

Financial Services

TREG.L
0.0%
HPRD.L
0.0%

Basic Materials

TREG.L

-

HPRD.L

-

Communication Services

TREG.L

-

HPRD.L

-

Consumer Defensive

TREG.L

-

HPRD.L

-

Energy

TREG.L

-

HPRD.L

-

Healthcare

TREG.L

-

HPRD.L

-

Industrials

TREG.L

-

HPRD.L

-

Technology

TREG.L

-

HPRD.L
0.3%

Utilities

TREG.L

-

HPRD.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF

HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF

Often compared with TREG.L:
TREG.L vs. HPRO.LTREG.L vs. IWDP.ASTREG.L vs. EPRA.LTREG.L vs. BCHS.LTREG.L vs. PFFRTREG.L vs. BBOX.LTREG.L vs. VOO
Often compared with HPRD.L:
HPRD.L vs. IWDP.ASHPRD.L vs. UKRE.LHPRD.L vs. IDVY.ASHPRD.L vs. VTHPRD.L vs. VNQHPRD.L vs. VUSA.LHPRD.L vs. VWCE.DE

Return for Risk

TREG.L vs. HPRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TREG.L
TREG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
TREG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TREG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
TREG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
TREG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TREG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
HPRD.L
HPRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
HPRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
HPRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TREG.L vs. HPRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TREG.L) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

TREG.LHPRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.89
1.05

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.34
1.53

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.19

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

1.47

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.50

4.95

-1.44

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TREG.L vs. HPRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TREG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the HPRD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TREG.L and HPRD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

TREG.LHPRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

1.05

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.15

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.27

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.40

-0.17

Drawdowns

TREG.L vs. HPRD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TREG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.66%, roughly equal to the maximum HPRD.L drawdown of -34.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TREG.L and HPRD.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TREG.LHPRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.66%

-34.92%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-8.62%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.30%

-17.00%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.89%

-26.80%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-34.92%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.88%

-3.46%

-3.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.40%

-9.19%

-1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

2.57%

+0.32%

Volatility

TREG.L vs. HPRD.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TREG.L) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRD.L) have volatilities of 3.46% and 3.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TREG.LHPRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

3.48%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.15%

9.61%

-0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.40%

12.02%

-0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.66%

15.03%

-0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

16.24%

+0.73%

TREG.L vs. HPRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TREG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than HPRD.L's 0.24% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TREG.L vs. HPRD.L - Dividend Comparison

TREG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than HPRD.L's 3.07% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HPRD.L
HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF		3.07%3.17%3.39%3.35%3.53%2.30%2.88%2.96%3.43%2.89%3.13%2.72%
TREG.L
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF		3.43%3.57%3.48%3.64%4.54%1.82%4.49%3.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

TREG.L and HPRD.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HPRD.L is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HPRD.L is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for TREG.L.

Both ETFs track FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TREG.L and 0.24% for HPRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TREG.L and HPRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer