PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRDFX vs. FSOPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRDFX vs. FSOPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crossmark Steward Values-FocusedSmall-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund (TRDFX) and Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSOPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRDFX achieves a 14.21% return, which is significantly lower than FSOPX's 16.83% return. Over the past 10 years, TRDFX has underperformed FSOPX with an annualized return of 9.78%, while FSOPX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.


TRDFX

1D
0.95%
1M
3.21%
YTD
14.21%
6M
14.01%
1Y
26.70%
3Y*
14.25%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
9.78%

FSOPX

1D
0.85%
1M
1.12%
YTD
16.83%
6M
15.66%
1Y
40.89%
3Y*
21.01%
5Y*
11.01%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRDFX vs. FSOPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRDFX
Crossmark Steward Values-FocusedSmall-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund
14.21%5.76%9.90%15.86%-14.98%26.35%10.40%21.40%-12.76%13.92%
FSOPX
Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund
16.83%15.81%15.31%20.38%-17.82%23.39%17.03%29.92%-8.12%11.10%

Correlation

The correlation between TRDFX and FSOPX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2007

0.97

The correlation between TRDFX and FSOPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRDFX vs. FSOPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRDFX
TRDFX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
TRDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
TRDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FSOPX
FSOPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FSOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FSOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRDFX vs. FSOPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward Values-FocusedSmall-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund (TRDFX) and Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSOPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRDFXFSOPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.41

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

4.35

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.62

17.03

-5.42

TRDFX vs. FSOPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRDFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the FSOPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRDFX and FSOPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRDFXFSOPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

2.42

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.51

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.58

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.39

-0.03

Drawdowns

TRDFX vs. FSOPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRDFX drawdown since its inception was -61.60%, roughly equal to the maximum FSOPX drawdown of -61.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRDFX and FSOPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRDFXFSOPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.60%

-61.75%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

-9.99%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.32%

-27.17%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.52%

-30.06%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.92%

-39.15%

-6.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.66%

+1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.97%

-10.37%

-2.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

2.54%

-0.09%

Volatility

TRDFX vs. FSOPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Crossmark Steward Values-FocusedSmall-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund (TRDFX) is 4.32%, while Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSOPX) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that TRDFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSOPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRDFXFSOPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.32%

5.26%

-0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.23%

13.46%

-2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.88%

17.92%

-2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.00%

21.70%

+0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.86%

21.99%

+0.87%

TRDFX vs. FSOPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRDFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FSOPX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRDFX vs. FSOPX - Dividend Comparison

TRDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.67%, more than FSOPX's 3.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSOPX
Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund
3.78%4.41%9.41%0.98%5.16%30.85%2.01%6.67%13.99%10.31%0.69%5.93%
TRDFX
Crossmark Steward Values-FocusedSmall-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund
7.67%8.76%6.18%4.29%28.61%13.92%4.16%3.50%15.78%7.77%3.51%13.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, TRDFX and FSOPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSOPX has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to TRDFX (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRDFX dropped -61.60% vs FSOPX's -61.75%.

FSOPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRDFX and FSOPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer