TRCLX vs. PRDGX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund (TRCLX) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX).
TRCLX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 9, 2019. PRDGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 30, 1992.
Performance
TRCLX vs. PRDGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRCLX vs. PRDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRCLX T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund | 8.83% | 36.23% | 10.95% | -15.51% | -26.24% | 6.28% | 59.73% | 6.20% |
PRDGX T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. | -2.47% | 14.74% | 13.48% | 13.68% | -10.22% | 26.03% | 13.92% | 3.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRCLX achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly higher than PRDGX's -2.47% return.
TRCLX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -9.57%
- YTD
- 8.83%
- 6M
- 11.35%
- 1Y
- 39.54%
- 3Y*
- 10.51%
- 5Y*
- 0.31%
- 10Y*
- —
PRDGX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -7.31%
- YTD
- -2.47%
- 6M
- -0.01%
- 1Y
- 9.42%
- 3Y*
- 12.29%
- 5Y*
- 9.25%
- 10Y*
- 12.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRCLX vs. PRDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRCLX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than PRDGX's 0.62% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRCLX vs. PRDGX — Risk / Return Rank
TRCLX
PRDGX
TRCLX vs. PRDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund (TRCLX) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRCLX | PRDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.02 | 0.71 | +1.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.54 | 1.08 | +1.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.16 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 0.80 | +1.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.83 | 3.83 | +7.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRCLX | PRDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 0.71 | +1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.66 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.65 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRCLX and PRDGX is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TRCLX vs. PRDGX - Dividend Comparison
TRCLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than PRDGX's 8.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRCLX T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund | 1.50% | 1.64% | 1.78% | 2.56% | 2.76% | 8.23% | 1.50% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRDGX T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. | 8.30% | 8.02% | 4.66% | 2.78% | 3.81% | 2.00% | 1.03% | 2.33% | 3.67% | 1.82% | 3.07% | 7.57% |
Drawdowns
TRCLX vs. PRDGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRCLX drawdown since its inception was -50.67%, roughly equal to the maximum PRDGX drawdown of -49.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRCLX and PRDGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRCLX | PRDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.67% | -49.79% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.78% | -11.28% | -2.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.91% | -19.31% | -30.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.89% | -7.32% | -2.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.33% | -5.44% | -17.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 2.34% | +0.83% |
Volatility
TRCLX vs. PRDGX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund (TRCLX) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) at 3.43%. This indicates that TRCLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRCLX | PRDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.53% | 3.43% | +3.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.03% | 7.35% | +5.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.55% | 15.00% | +4.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 14.05% | +8.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.43% | 15.86% | +7.57% |