TRCLX vs. MMCFX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

TRCLX (T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund) and MMCFX (AMG Veritas China Fund) are both China Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, TRCLX returned 2.38%/yr vs -8.23%/yr for MMCFX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRCLX charges 1.04%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for MMCFX.

Performance

TRCLX vs. MMCFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund (TRCLX) and AMG Veritas China Fund (MMCFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRCLX achieves a 28.90% return, which is significantly higher than MMCFX's 4.36% return.

TRCLX

• 1D: -1.03%
• 1M: 2.88%
• YTD: 28.90%
• 6M: 32.36%
• 1Y: 66.01%
• 3Y*: 21.06%
• 5Y*: 2.38%
• 10Y*: —

MMCFX

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: 1.41%
• YTD: 4.36%
• 6M: 3.26%
• 1Y: 21.73%
• 3Y*: 5.88%
• 5Y*: -8.23%
• 10Y*: 5.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRCLX vs. MMCFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TRCLX T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund	28.90%	36.23%	10.95%	-15.51%	-26.24%	6.28%	59.73%	6.20%
MMCFX AMG Veritas China Fund	4.36%	27.88%	-0.59%	-18.35%	-26.33%	-0.49%	17.79%	2.80%

Correlation

The correlation between TRCLX and MMCFX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2019	0.76

The correlation between TRCLX and MMCFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TRCLX vs. MMCFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRCLX

TRCLX Risk / Return Rank: 93
TRCLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
TRCLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
TRCLX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
TRCLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
TRCLX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

MMCFX

MMCFX Risk / Return Rank: 13
MMCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
MMCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
MMCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
MMCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
MMCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRCLX vs. MMCFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund (TRCLX) and AMG Veritas China Fund (MMCFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRCLX	MMCFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.71	1.09	+2.62
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.53	1.57	+2.96
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.62	1.20	+0.41
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.18	1.12	+5.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	22.20	2.49	+19.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRCLX vs. MMCFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRCLX Sharpe Ratio is 3.71, which is higher than the MMCFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRCLX and MMCFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRCLX	MMCFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.71	1.09	+2.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	-0.33	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.33	+0.23

Drawdowns

TRCLX vs. MMCFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRCLX drawdown since its inception was -50.67%, smaller than the maximum MMCFX drawdown of -70.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRCLX and MMCFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRCLX	MMCFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.67%	-70.40%	+19.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.47%	-18.42%	+7.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.49%	-29.01%	+3.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.44%	-57.12%	+7.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-57.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.03%	-35.81%	+32.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.77%	-26.67%	+3.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	8.30%	-5.39%

Volatility

TRCLX vs. MMCFX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund (TRCLX) and AMG Veritas China Fund (MMCFX) have volatilities of 7.20% and 7.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRCLX	MMCFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.20%	7.23%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.85%	14.85%	-1.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.18%	21.15%	-2.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.18%	25.32%	-2.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.42%	24.70%	-1.28%

TRCLX vs. MMCFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRCLX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MMCFX's 1.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRCLX vs. MMCFX - Dividend Comparison

TRCLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than MMCFX's 0.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MMCFX AMG Veritas China Fund	0.31%	0.32%	1.34%	0.83%	0.00%	114.57%	4.66%	9.14%	25.03%	12.44%	0.35%	12.74%
TRCLX T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund	1.27%	1.64%	1.78%	2.56%	2.76%	8.23%	1.50%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRCLX and MMCFX in my portfolio?

TRCLX and MMCFX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TRCLX or MMCFX?

MMCFX has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to TRCLX (7.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRCLX dropped -50.67% vs MMCFX's -70.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRCLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.71 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.