PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRBFX vs. TRRJX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRBFX vs. TRRJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund (TRBFX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRBFX achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than TRRJX's 7.57% return. Over the past 10 years, TRBFX has underperformed TRRJX with an annualized return of 2.81%, while TRRJX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.02% annualized return.


TRBFX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
0.99%
6M
1.21%
1Y
3.44%
3Y*
4.76%
5Y*
2.40%
10Y*
2.81%

TRRJX

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.91%
YTD
7.57%
6M
6.88%
1Y
12.68%
3Y*
13.21%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
10.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRBFX vs. TRRJX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRBFX
T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund
0.99%6.34%4.60%3.01%-5.19%5.77%5.65%6.53%0.28%0.80%
TRRJX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund
7.57%10.96%11.99%18.14%-17.96%15.21%17.04%23.72%-6.95%20.89%

Correlation

The correlation between TRBFX and TRRJX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2015

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRBFX vs. TRRJX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRBFX
TRBFX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TRBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TRBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

TRRJX
TRRJX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
TRRJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRJX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRJX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRBFX vs. TRRJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund (TRBFX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRBFXTRRJXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.23

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

1.59

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.01

6.07

-4.06

TRBFX vs. TRRJX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRBFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the TRRJX Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRBFX and TRRJX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRBFX vs. TRRJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRBFX drawdown since its inception was -7.33%, smaller than the maximum TRRJX drawdown of -53.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRBFX and TRRJX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRBFXTRRJXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.33%

-53.57%

+46.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.48%

-8.06%

+4.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.51%

-12.52%

+9.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.33%

-25.85%

+18.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.33%

-30.14%

+22.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-1.60%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.42%

-6.63%

+5.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

2.09%

-0.34%

Volatility

TRBFX vs. TRRJX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund (TRBFX) is 0.99%, while T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX) has a volatility of 4.09%. This indicates that TRBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRRJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRBFXTRRJXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

4.09%

-3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.76%

9.45%

-7.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.12%

11.04%

-5.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.15%

12.93%

-7.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.02%

13.50%

-9.48%

TRBFX vs. TRRJX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRBFX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than TRRJX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRBFX vs. TRRJX - Dividend Comparison

TRBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, while TRRJX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TRBFX
T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund
4.92%4.95%4.48%3.64%6.11%4.99%1.38%3.27%2.34%1.61%1.10%0.00%
TRRJX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund
0.00%0.00%2.36%4.68%9.67%6.89%4.80%5.68%8.55%3.80%2.89%4.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRBFX and TRRJX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRRJX has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to TRBFX (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRBFX dropped -7.33% vs TRRJX's -53.57%.

TRRJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRBFX and TRRJX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer