TQVIX vs. PRDGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TQVIX (T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Value Equity Fund) and PRDGX (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.) are both mutual funds - TQVIX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while PRDGX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 10 years, TQVIX returned 11.66%/yr vs 12.87%/yr for PRDGX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TQVIX charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for PRDGX.

Performance

TQVIX vs. PRDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Value Equity Fund (TQVIX) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQVIX achieves a 12.84% return, which is significantly higher than PRDGX's 7.60% return. Over the past 10 years, TQVIX has underperformed PRDGX with an annualized return of 11.66%, while PRDGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.87% annualized return.

TQVIX

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 3.64%
• YTD: 12.84%
• 6M: 13.87%
• 1Y: 27.06%
• 3Y*: 19.02%
• 5Y*: 11.03%
• 10Y*: 11.66%

PRDGX

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 3.23%
• YTD: 7.60%
• 6M: 7.74%
• 1Y: 17.14%
• 3Y*: 15.54%
• 5Y*: 10.09%
• 10Y*: 12.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQVIX vs. PRDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TQVIX T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Value Equity Fund	12.84%	14.88%	16.20%	11.79%	-3.29%	29.07%	-0.23%	25.53%	-10.80%	13.83%
PRDGX T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.	7.60%	14.74%	13.48%	13.68%	-10.22%	26.03%	13.92%	31.76%	-1.06%	18.89%

Correlation

The correlation between TQVIX and PRDGX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2016	0.86

The correlation between TQVIX and PRDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TQVIX vs. PRDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQVIX

TQVIX Risk / Return Rank: 78
TQVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
TQVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
TQVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
TQVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
TQVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

PRDGX

PRDGX Risk / Return Rank: 40
PRDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
PRDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
PRDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
PRDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
PRDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQVIX vs. PRDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Value Equity Fund (TQVIX) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TQVIX	PRDGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	1.82	+0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.64	2.60	+1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.32	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.83	2.41	+1.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.48	9.85	+6.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TQVIX vs. PRDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQVIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the PRDGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQVIX and PRDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TQVIX	PRDGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.58	1.82	+0.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.72	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	0.81	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.66	+0.02

Drawdowns

TQVIX vs. PRDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQVIX drawdown since its inception was -40.69%, smaller than the maximum PRDGX drawdown of -49.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQVIX and PRDGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TQVIX	PRDGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.69%	-49.79%	+9.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.26%	-7.34%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.60%	-14.15%	-1.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.59%	-19.31%	+0.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.69%	-33.18%	-7.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	0.00%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.72%	-5.42%	+0.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.68%	1.79%	-0.11%

Volatility

TQVIX vs. PRDGX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Value Equity Fund (TQVIX) has a higher volatility of 3.10% compared to T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) at 2.33%. This indicates that TQVIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TQVIX	PRDGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.10%	2.33%	+0.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.27%	7.56%	+0.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.77%	9.72%	+1.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.99%	14.06%	+0.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.45%	15.88%	+2.57%

TQVIX vs. PRDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQVIX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than PRDGX's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

TQVIX vs. PRDGX - Dividend Comparison

TQVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, less than PRDGX's 7.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRDGX T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.	7.52%	8.02%	4.66%	2.78%	3.81%	2.00%	1.03%	2.33%	3.67%	1.82%	3.07%	7.57%
TQVIX T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Value Equity Fund	4.31%	4.87%	8.44%	7.46%	6.32%	2.68%	2.26%	3.75%	5.76%	1.92%	1.81%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TQVIX and PRDGX in my portfolio?

TQVIX and PRDGX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TQVIX or PRDGX?

TQVIX has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to PRDGX (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQVIX dropped -40.69% vs PRDGX's -49.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TQVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.