PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQSMX vs. TISBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TQSMX vs. TISBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (TQSMX) and TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQSMX achieves a 19.83% return, which is significantly lower than TISBX's 20.94% return. Over the past 10 years, TQSMX has outperformed TISBX with an annualized return of 12.54%, while TISBX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.64% annualized return.


TQSMX

1D
1.24%
1M
0.57%
6M
13.10%
YTD
19.83%
1Y
30.99%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
12.37%
10Y*
12.54%
ALL TIME*
13.64%

TISBX

1D
1.73%
1M
-0.41%
6M
13.31%
YTD
20.94%
1Y
36.38%
3Y*
16.66%
5Y*
7.84%
10Y*
10.64%
ALL TIME*
9.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TQSMX vs. TISBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TQSMX
T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund
19.83%12.75%16.34%21.72%-13.07%21.85%11.68%30.19%-10.91%15.44%
TISBX
TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund
20.94%12.72%11.60%17.07%-20.31%14.85%20.14%25.61%-10.99%13.14%

Correlation

The correlation between TQSMX and TISBX is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2016

0.96

The correlation between TQSMX and TISBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TQSMX vs. TISBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TQSMX
TQSMX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
TQSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TQSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

TISBX
TISBX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
TISBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TISBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TISBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
TISBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
TISBX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TQSMX vs. TISBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (TQSMX) and TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TQSMXTISBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.34

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.62

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.52

12.82

-0.31

TQSMX vs. TISBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the TISBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQSMX and TISBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TQSMX vs. TISBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQSMX drawdown since its inception was -40.66%, smaller than the maximum TISBX drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQSMX and TISBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TQSMXTISBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.66%

-56.50%

+15.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-10.95%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.82%

-27.44%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.82%

-31.89%

+8.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.66%

-41.69%

+1.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-1.33%

+0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.11%

-9.63%

+4.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

3.08%

-0.46%

Volatility

TQSMX vs. TISBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (TQSMX) is 3.77%, while TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that TQSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TISBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TQSMXTISBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

4.21%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.59%

14.09%

-0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.15%

19.37%

-2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.62%

22.53%

-2.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.37%

23.42%

-3.05%

TQSMX vs. TISBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQSMX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than TISBX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

TQSMX vs. TISBX - Dividend Comparison

TQSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than TISBX's 3.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TISBX
TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund
3.41%4.12%6.82%3.09%1.97%8.96%2.65%5.16%9.29%4.49%4.03%4.77%
TQSMX
T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund
0.96%1.15%6.48%3.39%6.06%1.40%0.81%1.18%2.12%0.35%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, TQSMX and TISBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TISBX has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to TQSMX (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQSMX dropped -40.66% vs TISBX's -56.50%.

TISBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQSMX and TISBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer