TQSMX vs. FSOPX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (TQSMX) and Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSOPX).
TQSMX is an actively managed fund by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Feb 26, 2016. FSOPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 22, 2007.
Performance
TQSMX vs. FSOPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TQSMX vs. FSOPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQSMX T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund | 1.27% | 13.55% | 16.34% | 21.72% | -13.07% | 21.85% | 11.68% | 30.19% | -10.91% | 15.44% |
FSOPX Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund | 4.69% | 15.81% | 15.31% | 20.38% | -17.82% | 23.39% | 17.03% | 29.92% | -8.12% | 11.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TQSMX achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than FSOPX's 4.69% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TQSMX having a 11.58% annualized return and FSOPX not far ahead at 11.92%.
TQSMX
- 1D
- 3.48%
- 1M
- -6.58%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 4.09%
- 1Y
- 21.32%
- 3Y*
- 16.21%
- 5Y*
- 9.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.58%
FSOPX
- 1D
- 3.79%
- 1M
- -5.19%
- YTD
- 4.69%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 32.66%
- 3Y*
- 17.07%
- 5Y*
- 8.69%
- 10Y*
- 11.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TQSMX vs. FSOPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TQSMX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than FSOPX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TQSMX vs. FSOPX — Risk / Return Rank
TQSMX
FSOPX
TQSMX vs. FSOPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (TQSMX) and Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSOPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TQSMX | FSOPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 1.48 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 2.13 | -0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.28 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 2.35 | -0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.47 | 10.03 | -3.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TQSMX | FSOPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 1.48 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.40 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.55 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.36 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between TQSMX and FSOPX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TQSMX vs. FSOPX - Dividend Comparison
TQSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than FSOPX's 4.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQSMX T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund | 1.85% | 1.87% | 6.48% | 3.39% | 6.06% | 1.40% | 0.81% | 1.18% | 2.12% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSOPX Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund | 4.22% | 4.41% | 9.41% | 0.98% | 5.16% | 30.85% | 2.01% | 6.67% | 13.99% | 10.31% | 0.69% | 5.93% |
Drawdowns
TQSMX vs. FSOPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TQSMX drawdown since its inception was -40.66%, smaller than the maximum FSOPX drawdown of -61.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQSMX and FSOPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TQSMX | FSOPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.66% | -61.75% | +21.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.08% | -13.87% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.82% | -30.06% | +6.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.66% | -39.15% | -1.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.26% | -6.29% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.23% | -10.45% | +5.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 3.25% | +0.06% |
Volatility
TQSMX vs. FSOPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (TQSMX) is 7.47%, while Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSOPX) has a volatility of 8.00%. This indicates that TQSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSOPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TQSMX | FSOPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.47% | 8.00% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.34% | 13.55% | -1.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.12% | 22.47% | -1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.44% | 21.70% | -2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.28% | 21.93% | -1.65% |