PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQSMX vs. AZBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TQSMX vs. AZBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (TQSMX) and Virtus Small-Cap Fund (AZBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TQSMX having a 19.83% return and AZBIX slightly higher at 20.46%. Over the past 10 years, TQSMX has outperformed AZBIX with an annualized return of 12.54%, while AZBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.60% annualized return.


TQSMX

1D
1.24%
1M
0.57%
6M
13.10%
YTD
19.83%
1Y
30.99%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
12.37%
10Y*
12.54%
ALL TIME*
13.64%

AZBIX

1D
1.19%
1M
-0.37%
6M
14.21%
YTD
20.46%
1Y
31.52%
3Y*
17.45%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*
11.60%
ALL TIME*
11.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TQSMX vs. AZBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TQSMX
T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund
19.83%12.75%16.34%21.72%-13.07%21.85%11.68%30.19%-10.91%15.44%
AZBIX
Virtus Small-Cap Fund
20.46%8.49%19.06%14.09%-18.04%18.92%16.98%24.13%-9.25%21.27%

Correlation

The correlation between TQSMX and AZBIX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2016

0.95

The correlation between TQSMX and AZBIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TQSMX vs. AZBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TQSMX
TQSMX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
TQSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TQSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

AZBIX
AZBIX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
AZBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AZBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
AZBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
AZBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
AZBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TQSMX vs. AZBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (TQSMX) and Virtus Small-Cap Fund (AZBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TQSMXAZBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.34

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.67

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.52

12.28

+0.24

TQSMX vs. AZBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the AZBIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQSMX and AZBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TQSMX vs. AZBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQSMX drawdown since its inception was -40.66%, roughly equal to the maximum AZBIX drawdown of -40.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQSMX and AZBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TQSMXAZBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.66%

-40.80%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-9.33%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.82%

-29.01%

+5.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.82%

-29.85%

+6.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.66%

-40.80%

+0.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-2.40%

+1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.11%

-7.64%

+2.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.79%

-0.17%

Volatility

TQSMX vs. AZBIX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (TQSMX) and Virtus Small-Cap Fund (AZBIX) have volatilities of 3.77% and 3.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TQSMXAZBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

3.95%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.59%

13.10%

+0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.15%

17.42%

-0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.62%

20.50%

-0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.37%

21.35%

-0.98%

TQSMX vs. AZBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQSMX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than AZBIX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

TQSMX vs. AZBIX - Dividend Comparison

TQSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than AZBIX's 4.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AZBIX
Virtus Small-Cap Fund
4.07%4.90%10.82%2.31%4.78%13.82%0.45%0.38%9.62%13.80%0.03%3.59%
TQSMX
T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund
0.96%1.15%6.48%3.39%6.06%1.40%0.81%1.18%2.12%0.35%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, TQSMX and AZBIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AZBIX has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to TQSMX (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQSMX dropped -40.66% vs AZBIX's -40.80%.

AZBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQSMX and AZBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer