PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQSIX vs. TBCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TQSIX vs. TBCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (TQSIX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQSIX achieves a 18.73% return, which is significantly higher than TBCIX's -3.25% return. Over the past 10 years, TQSIX has underperformed TBCIX with an annualized return of 12.75%, while TBCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.53% annualized return.


TQSIX

1D
1.18%
1M
-0.50%
6M
12.97%
YTD
18.73%
1Y
31.60%
3Y*
18.14%
5Y*
12.24%
10Y*
12.75%
ALL TIME*
13.81%

TBCIX

1D
2.29%
1M
-2.44%
6M
-1.33%
YTD
-3.25%
1Y
5.31%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
16.53%
ALL TIME*
15.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TQSIX vs. TBCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TQSIX
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund
18.73%12.94%16.54%21.99%-12.97%22.12%11.92%30.43%-10.78%15.52%
TBCIX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class
-3.25%18.94%48.73%49.61%-38.48%18.30%34.90%30.30%2.13%36.68%

Correlation

The correlation between TQSIX and TBCIX is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2016

0.70

The correlation between TQSIX and TBCIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TQSIX vs. TBCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TQSIX
TQSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
TQSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TQSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

TBCIX
TBCIX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TBCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TBCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TQSIX vs. TBCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (TQSIX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TQSIXTBCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.05

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

0.23

+2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.95

0.68

+10.27

TQSIX vs. TBCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the TBCIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQSIX and TBCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TQSIX vs. TBCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQSIX drawdown since its inception was -40.65%, smaller than the maximum TBCIX drawdown of -43.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQSIX and TBCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TQSIXTBCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.65%

-43.26%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.41%

-16.96%

+6.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.76%

-23.06%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.76%

-43.26%

+19.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.65%

-43.26%

+2.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-8.96%

+7.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-8.04%

+2.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

5.64%

-3.01%

Volatility

TQSIX vs. TBCIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (TQSIX) is 3.60%, while T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that TQSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TBCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TQSIXTBCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

5.92%

-2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.58%

14.30%

-0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.16%

17.67%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.60%

24.16%

-4.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.34%

22.85%

-2.51%

TQSIX vs. TBCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQSIX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than TBCIX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

TQSIX vs. TBCIX - Dividend Comparison

TQSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than TBCIX's 5.38% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
TBCIX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class
5.38%5.20%18.28%3.47%5.84%10.03%1.18%0.59%2.50%3.05%0.81%
TQSIX
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund
1.11%1.32%6.61%3.55%6.35%1.58%0.81%1.24%2.28%0.42%0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


TQSIX and TBCIX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBCIX has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to TQSIX (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQSIX dropped -40.65% vs TBCIX's -43.26%.

TQSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQSIX and TBCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer