TQQQ vs. TERG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG).

TQQQ and TERG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TQQQ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). It was launched on Feb 9, 2010. TERG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Nov 17, 2025.

Performance

TQQQ vs. TERG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TQQQ vs. TERG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	-17.87%	3.48%
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF	102.79%	28.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQQ achieves a -17.87% return, which is significantly lower than TERG's 102.79% return.

TQQQ

• 1D: 3.72%
• 1M: -12.88%
• YTD: -17.87%
• 6M: -17.28%
• 1Y: 48.52%
• 3Y*: 46.87%
• 5Y*: 13.55%
• 10Y*: 35.31%

TERG

• 1D: 14.40%
• 1M: -19.76%
• YTD: 102.79%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQQQ vs. TERG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TERG's 0.75% expense ratio.

TQQQ

ProShares UltraPro QQQ

TERG

Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF

Return for Risk

TQQQ vs. TERG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQQQ

TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 47
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 50
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQQQ vs. TERG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TQQQ	TERG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.28	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TQQQ	TERG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	10.56	-9.92

Correlation

The correlation between TQQQ and TERG is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

TQQQ vs. TERG - Dividend Comparison

TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while TERG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	0.73%	0.65%	1.27%	1.26%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TQQQ vs. TERG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQQ drawdown since its inception was -81.66%, which is greater than TERG's maximum drawdown of -39.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ and TERG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TQQQ	TERG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.66%	-39.32%	-42.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.97%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-81.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.08%	-30.58%	+2.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.66%	-9.77%	-8.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.13%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TQQQ	TERG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.74%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.50%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.35%	124.59%	-57.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	66.53%	124.59%	-58.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	65.83%	124.59%	-58.76%