TQQQ vs. TERG
TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) and TERG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. TQQQ is passively managed, while TERG is actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TQQQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TERG.
Performance
TQQQ vs. TERG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TQQQ achieves a 42.40% return, which is significantly lower than TERG's 307.47% return.
TQQQ
- 1D
- 2.25%
- 1M
- -8.54%
- YTD
- 42.40%
- 6M
- 35.61%
- 1Y
- 91.80%
- 3Y*
- 60.52%
- 5Y*
- 21.71%
- 10Y*
- 46.45%
TERG
- 1D
- 20.81%
- 1M
- 35.52%
- YTD
- 307.47%
- 6M
- 286.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TQQQ vs. TERG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 42.40% | 0.83% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 307.47% | 20.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between TQQQ and TERG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TQQQ vs. TERG — Risk / Return Rank
TQQQ
TERG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TQQQ vs. TERG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TQQQ | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.89 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TQQQ vs. TERG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TQQQ drawdown since its inception was -81.66%, which is greater than TERG's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ and TERG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TQQQ | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.66% | -49.52% | -32.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.07% | 0.00% | -14.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.49% | -14.48% | -4.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.67% | — | — |
Volatility
TQQQ vs. TERG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TQQQ | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.81% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.27% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.22% | 147.05% | -93.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.42% | 147.05% | -79.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.30% | 147.05% | -80.75% |
TQQQ vs. TERG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TERG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TQQQ vs. TERG - Dividend Comparison
TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, while TERG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.27% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TQQQ and TERG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TERG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TERG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.
TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.00% for TERG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TQQQ and 0.75% for TERG.
Find the right allocation for TQQQ and TERG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer