PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQQQ vs. SSO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TQQQ vs. SSO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQQ achieves a 61.91% return, which is significantly higher than SSO's 20.20% return. Over the past 10 years, TQQQ has outperformed SSO with an annualized return of 44.95%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively lower 24.16% annualized return.


TQQQ

1D
-1.55%
1M
26.46%
YTD
61.91%
6M
54.01%
1Y
132.34%
3Y*
68.49%
5Y*
27.97%
10Y*
44.95%

SSO

1D
0.70%
1M
8.84%
YTD
20.20%
6M
19.43%
1Y
53.91%
3Y*
38.10%
5Y*
19.79%
10Y*
24.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQQQ vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
61.91%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
20.20%26.19%43.48%46.65%-38.98%60.57%21.54%63.45%-14.60%44.35%

Correlation

The correlation between TQQQ and SSO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

0.90

The correlation between TQQQ and SSO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

TQQQ vs. SSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TQQQ
SSO

Technology

53.8%
35.6%

Communication Services

15.8%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
4.9%

Healthcare

4.2%
8.5%

Industrials

2.8%
8.3%

Utilities

1.4%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.8%

Energy

0.6%
3.5%

Financial Services

0.2%
11.8%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.9%

Technology

TQQQ
53.8%
SSO
35.6%

Communication Services

TQQQ
15.8%
SSO
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

TQQQ
12.3%
SSO
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

TQQQ
7.7%
SSO
4.9%

Healthcare

TQQQ
4.2%
SSO
8.5%

Industrials

TQQQ
2.8%
SSO
8.3%

Utilities

TQQQ
1.4%
SSO
2.4%

Basic Materials

TQQQ
1.1%
SSO
1.8%

Energy

TQQQ
0.6%
SSO
3.5%

Financial Services

TQQQ
0.2%
SSO
11.8%

Real Estate

TQQQ
0.1%
SSO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TQQQ vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SSO
SSO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQQQ vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TQQQSSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.38

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

2.98

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.77

13.10

-1.32

TQQQ vs. SSO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the SSO Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQQQ and SSO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TQQQSSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

2.30

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.59

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.68

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.42

+0.32

Drawdowns

TQQQ vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQQ drawdown since its inception was -81.66%, roughly equal to the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ and SSO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TQQQSSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.66%

-84.67%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.97%

-18.17%

-18.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.04%

-35.21%

-22.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

-46.73%

-34.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

-59.34%

-22.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.29%

-0.71%

-1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.52%

-19.57%

+1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.28%

4.13%

+7.15%

Volatility

TQQQ vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a higher volatility of 13.35% compared to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) at 5.56%. This indicates that TQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TQQQSSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.35%

5.56%

+7.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.04%

17.78%

+18.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.60%

23.59%

+24.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.50%

33.64%

+32.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.95%

35.89%

+30.06%

TQQQ vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

TQQQ vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison

TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than SSO's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
0.61%0.68%0.85%0.18%0.50%0.18%0.20%0.50%0.75%0.39%0.51%0.63%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.37%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, TQQQ and SSO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TQQQ has higher volatility (13.35%) compared to SSO (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQQ dropped -81.66% vs SSO's -84.67%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 44.95% vs 24.16% for SSO. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 5.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 44.95% return vs 24.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

SSO has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.37% for TQQQ.

TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while SSO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TQQQ and 0.87% for SSO.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQQQ and SSO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer