TQQQ.TO vs. HXQ.TO
TQQQ.TO (BetaPro 3x Nasdaq-100 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF) and HXQ.TO (Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - TQQQ.TO tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index while HXQ.TO tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TQQQ.TO returned 93.21% vs 39.36% for HXQ.TO. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
TQQQ.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TQQQ.TO achieves a 38.31% return, which is significantly higher than HXQ.TO's 20.53% return.
TQQQ.TO
- 1D
- -10.09%
- 1M
- -4.73%
- YTD
- 38.31%
- 6M
- 32.51%
- 1Y
- 93.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HXQ.TO
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- 20.53%
- 6M
- 19.26%
- 1Y
- 39.36%
- 3Y*
- 29.01%
- 5Y*
- 19.15%
- 10Y*
- 22.49%
TQQQ.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TQQQ.TO BetaPro 3x Nasdaq-100 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF | 38.31% | 38.56% |
HXQ.TO Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF | 20.53% | 16.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between TQQQ.TO and HXQ.TO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025 | 0.94 |
The correlation between TQQQ.TO and HXQ.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TQQQ.TO vs. HXQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
TQQQ.TO
HXQ.TO
TQQQ.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro 3x Nasdaq-100 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF (TQQQ.TO) and Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TQQQ.TO | HXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.41 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 3.18 | -0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.67 | 10.07 | -2.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TQQQ.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TQQQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.15%, which is greater than HXQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -31.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ.TO and HXQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TQQQ.TO | HXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.15% | -31.60% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.15% | -12.43% | -25.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.99% | -3.00% | -11.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.56% | -5.73% | -2.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.20% | 3.92% | +8.28% |
Volatility
TQQQ.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
BetaPro 3x Nasdaq-100 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF (TQQQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 27.08% compared to Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) at 8.43%. This indicates that TQQQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HXQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TQQQ.TO | HXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.08% | 8.43% | +18.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.38% | 13.93% | +29.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.25% | 17.40% | +35.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.03% | 21.03% | +32.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.03% | 20.99% | +32.04% |
Dividends
TQQQ.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither TQQQ.TO nor HXQ.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, TQQQ.TO and HXQ.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TQQQ.TO tracks Nasdaq-100 Index, while HXQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Horizons.
Find the right allocation for TQQQ.TO and HXQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer