TQQQ.TO vs. QQCC.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BetaPro 3x Nasdaq-100 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF (TQQQ.TO) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO).

TQQQ.TO and QQCC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TQQQ.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. It was launched on Jun 16, 2025. QQCC.TO is managed by Global X. It was launched on Sep 13, 2011.

Performance

TQQQ.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro 3x Nasdaq-100 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF (TQQQ.TO) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TQQQ.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TQQQ.TO BetaPro 3x Nasdaq-100 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF	-21.77%	41.06%
QQCC.TO Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF	-3.61%	15.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQQ.TO achieves a -21.77% return, which is significantly lower than QQCC.TO's -3.61% return.

TQQQ.TO

• 1D: 10.02%
• 1M: -16.10%
• YTD: -21.77%
• 6M: -20.84%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQCC.TO

• 1D: 1.82%
• 1M: -3.14%
• YTD: -3.61%
• 6M: -1.75%
• 1Y: 15.14%
• 3Y*: 18.64%
• 5Y*: 12.76%
• 10Y*: 9.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQQQ.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQCC.TO

Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF

Return for Risk

TQQQ.TO vs. QQCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQCC.TO

QQCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 48
QQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
QQCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
QQCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 51
QQCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
QQCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQQQ.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro 3x Nasdaq-100 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF (TQQQ.TO) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TQQQ.TO	QQCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	-0.00	+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between TQQQ.TO and QQCC.TO is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

TQQQ.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

TQQQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.12%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TQQQ.TO BetaPro 3x Nasdaq-100 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQCC.TO Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF	11.12%	11.27%	9.89%	11.85%	11.04%	5.15%	5.84%	6.31%	7.90%	6.01%	6.73%	8.89%

Drawdowns

TQQQ.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.15%, smaller than the maximum QQCC.TO drawdown of -100.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ.TO and QQCC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	TQQQ.TO	QQCC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.15%	-100.13%	+61.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.73%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.96%	-100.00%	+68.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.95%	-99.78%	+90.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.15%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TQQQ.TO	QQCC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.36%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.43%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.10%	20.26%	+26.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.10%	17.51%	+29.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.10%	17.30%	+29.80%