TQGIX vs. GLOSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TQGIX (T. Rowe Price QM Global Equity Fund) and GLOSX (Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, TQGIX returned 13.22%/yr vs 15.22%/yr for GLOSX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TQGIX charges 0.58%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for GLOSX.

Performance

TQGIX vs. GLOSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price QM Global Equity Fund (TQGIX) and Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A (GLOSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQGIX achieves a 13.85% return, which is significantly lower than GLOSX's 16.09% return.

TQGIX

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 6.06%
• YTD: 13.85%
• 6M: 15.17%
• 1Y: 30.70%
• 3Y*: 23.21%
• 5Y*: 13.22%
• 10Y*: —

GLOSX

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 5.41%
• YTD: 16.09%
• 6M: 17.80%
• 1Y: 41.34%
• 3Y*: 25.80%
• 5Y*: 15.22%
• 10Y*: 13.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQGIX vs. GLOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TQGIX T. Rowe Price QM Global Equity Fund	13.85%	22.82%	18.08%	23.86%	-17.12%	19.87%	15.49%	27.89%	-9.95%	24.18%
GLOSX Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A	16.09%	41.25%	11.45%	16.70%	-9.75%	23.28%	17.79%	23.30%	-16.32%	20.83%

Correlation

The correlation between TQGIX and GLOSX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.92

The correlation between TQGIX and GLOSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TQGIX vs. GLOSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQGIX

TQGIX Risk / Return Rank: 73
TQGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
TQGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
TQGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
TQGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
TQGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

GLOSX

GLOSX Risk / Return Rank: 88
GLOSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
GLOSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
GLOSX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
GLOSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
GLOSX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQGIX vs. GLOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price QM Global Equity Fund (TQGIX) and Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A (GLOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TQGIX	GLOSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	3.16	-0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.55	4.18	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.57	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	4.16	-1.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.21	16.78	-2.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TQGIX vs. GLOSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQGIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the GLOSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQGIX and GLOSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TQGIX	GLOSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.58	3.16	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	0.98	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.49	+0.34

Drawdowns

TQGIX vs. GLOSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQGIX drawdown since its inception was -32.97%, smaller than the maximum GLOSX drawdown of -54.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQGIX and GLOSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TQGIX	GLOSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.97%	-54.40%	+21.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.96%	-10.04%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.92%	-14.66%	-1.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.44%	-23.72%	-1.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.81%	-9.79%	+4.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	2.49%	-0.30%

Volatility

TQGIX vs. GLOSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price QM Global Equity Fund (TQGIX) is 3.58%, while Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A (GLOSX) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that TQGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TQGIX	GLOSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.58%	4.31%	-0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.76%	10.25%	-0.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.09%	13.28%	-1.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.33%	15.59%	-0.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.73%	16.84%	-0.11%

TQGIX vs. GLOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQGIX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than GLOSX's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

TQGIX vs. GLOSX - Dividend Comparison

TQGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than GLOSX's 9.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLOSX Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A	9.93%	11.53%	7.73%	1.55%	6.04%	21.00%	0.87%	0.93%	10.44%	1.27%	1.25%	0.60%
TQGIX T. Rowe Price QM Global Equity Fund	3.05%	3.47%	4.48%	3.04%	21.41%	0.87%	0.93%	1.41%	1.96%	1.49%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TQGIX and GLOSX in my portfolio?

TQGIX and GLOSX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TQGIX or GLOSX?

GLOSX has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to TQGIX (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQGIX dropped -32.97% vs GLOSX's -54.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLOSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.