TQGEX vs. PCCOX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TQGEX (T. Rowe Price Integrated Global Equity Fund) and PCCOX (T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund I Class) are both mutual funds - TQGEX is a Global Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while PCCOX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. TQGEX is actively managed, while PCCOX is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TQGEX returned 12.74%/yr vs 14.28%/yr for PCCOX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TQGEX charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for PCCOX.

Performance

TQGEX vs. PCCOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Integrated Global Equity Fund (TQGEX) and T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund I Class (PCCOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQGEX achieves a 12.94% return, which is significantly higher than PCCOX's 10.60% return.

TQGEX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 1.57%
• YTD: 12.94%
• 6M: 12.25%
• 1Y: 28.78%
• 3Y*: 22.31%
• 5Y*: 12.74%
• 10Y*: —

PCCOX

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 10.60%
• 6M: 9.51%
• 1Y: 25.91%
• 3Y*: 22.18%
• 5Y*: 14.28%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQGEX vs. PCCOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TQGEX T. Rowe Price Integrated Global Equity Fund	12.94%	22.55%	17.91%	23.69%	-17.22%	19.65%	15.35%	27.66%	-10.02%	24.08%
PCCOX T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund I Class	10.60%	16.49%	26.56%	29.93%	-18.71%	28.17%	19.96%	33.13%	-4.55%	23.01%

Correlation

The correlation between TQGEX and PCCOX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.95

The correlation between TQGEX and PCCOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TQGEX vs. PCCOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQGEX

TQGEX Risk / Return Rank: 72
TQGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
TQGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
TQGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
TQGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
TQGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

PCCOX

PCCOX Risk / Return Rank: 65
PCCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
PCCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
PCCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
PCCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
PCCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQGEX vs. PCCOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Integrated Global Equity Fund (TQGEX) and T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund I Class (PCCOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TQGEX	PCCOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	2.17	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	2.97	+0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.39	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	2.94	+0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.36	13.34	+0.03

TQGEX vs. PCCOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQGEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the PCCOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQGEX and PCCOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TQGEX vs. PCCOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQGEX drawdown since its inception was -32.97%, roughly equal to the maximum PCCOX drawdown of -34.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQGEX and PCCOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TQGEX	PCCOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.97%	-34.42%	+1.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.92%	-9.30%	-0.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.96%	-19.37%	+3.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.55%	-24.90%	-0.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.79%	-1.36%	+0.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.83%	-4.49%	-0.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	2.04%	+0.18%

Volatility

TQGEX vs. PCCOX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Integrated Global Equity Fund (TQGEX) and T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund I Class (PCCOX) have volatilities of 4.99% and 4.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TQGEX	PCCOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.99%	4.93%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.65%	10.31%	+0.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.82%	12.66%	+0.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.45%	17.44%	-1.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.74%	18.72%	-1.98%

TQGEX vs. PCCOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQGEX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than PCCOX's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

TQGEX vs. PCCOX - Dividend Comparison

TQGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, more than PCCOX's 1.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PCCOX T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund I Class	1.11%	1.23%	0.71%	1.22%	1.38%	3.78%	1.12%	1.45%	5.77%	7.18%
TQGEX T. Rowe Price Integrated Global Equity Fund	2.94%	3.32%	4.28%	2.93%	20.83%	0.77%	0.93%	1.41%	1.78%	1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TQGEX and PCCOX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, TQGEX and PCCOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TQGEX or PCCOX?

TQGEX has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to PCCOX (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQGEX dropped -32.97% vs PCCOX's -34.42%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TQGEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.