PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQAIX vs. SSCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TQAIX vs. SSCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund Class I (TQAIX) and Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQAIX achieves a 14.83% return, which is significantly lower than SSCPX's 21.31% return. Over the past 10 years, TQAIX has outperformed SSCPX with an annualized return of 11.87%, while SSCPX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.22% annualized return.


TQAIX

1D
0.91%
1M
3.82%
YTD
14.83%
6M
13.64%
1Y
29.15%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*
11.87%

SSCPX

1D
1.22%
1M
5.06%
YTD
21.31%
6M
19.23%
1Y
34.86%
3Y*
17.90%
5Y*
7.91%
10Y*
11.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQAIX vs. SSCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TQAIX
T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund Class I
14.83%10.28%13.10%21.34%-22.38%11.32%24.01%32.92%-6.77%22.26%
SSCPX
Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio
21.31%6.41%10.79%15.16%-17.56%24.53%25.39%23.71%-16.14%15.58%

Correlation

The correlation between TQAIX and SSCPX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2016

0.94

The correlation between TQAIX and SSCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TQAIX vs. SSCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQAIX
TQAIX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
TQAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
TQAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

SSCPX
SSCPX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SSCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SSCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQAIX vs. SSCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund Class I (TQAIX) and Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TQAIXSSCPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.65

1.86

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.36

2.60

-0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.32

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

3.16

-0.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.96

10.76

-0.81

TQAIX vs. SSCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the SSCPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQAIX and SSCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TQAIXSSCPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

1.86

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.36

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.49

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.39

+0.19

Drawdowns

TQAIX vs. SSCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQAIX drawdown since its inception was -37.58%, smaller than the maximum SSCPX drawdown of -53.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQAIX and SSCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TQAIXSSCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.58%

-53.65%

+16.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.07%

-11.54%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.78%

-27.78%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.12%

-27.78%

-5.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.58%

-43.59%

+6.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

0.00%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.56%

-10.25%

+2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

3.38%

-0.27%

Volatility

TQAIX vs. SSCPX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund Class I (TQAIX) and Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX) have volatilities of 6.04% and 5.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TQAIXSSCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

5.77%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.76%

14.57%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.83%

19.63%

-0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.35%

22.17%

-0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.51%

22.99%

-1.48%

TQAIX vs. SSCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQAIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than SSCPX's 1.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

TQAIX vs. SSCPX - Dividend Comparison

TQAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, less than SSCPX's 7.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSCPX
Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio
7.43%9.02%11.37%0.00%10.18%24.67%0.02%0.00%17.42%0.00%0.00%58.90%
TQAIX
T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund Class I
5.46%6.27%8.01%2.41%3.70%13.89%3.01%4.11%4.68%0.21%0.02%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, TQAIX and SSCPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TQAIX has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to SSCPX (5.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQAIX dropped -37.58% vs SSCPX's -53.65%.

SSCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQAIX and SSCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer