TPYP vs. ION
Compare and contrast key facts about Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) and Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION).
TPYP and ION are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TPYP is a passively managed fund by Tortoise that tracks the performance of the Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. It was launched on Jun 30, 2015. ION is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Core Battery Metals Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Nov 29, 2022. Both TPYP and ION are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
TPYP vs. ION - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TPYP vs. ION - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 20.98% | 7.59% | 37.37% | 10.51% | -4.68% |
ION Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF | 9.49% | 108.37% | -20.02% | -14.10% | -8.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPYP achieves a 20.98% return, which is significantly higher than ION's 9.49% return.
TPYP
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 20.98%
- 6M
- 18.25%
- 1Y
- 20.82%
- 3Y*
- 25.55%
- 5Y*
- 21.03%
- 10Y*
- 13.45%
ION
- 1D
- 2.98%
- 1M
- -12.58%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 46.23%
- 1Y
- 124.76%
- 3Y*
- 16.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TPYP vs. ION - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPYP has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ION's 0.58% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TPYP vs. ION — Risk / Return Rank
TPYP
ION
TPYP vs. ION - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) and Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TPYP | ION | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 3.21 | -1.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 3.47 | -1.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.47 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 5.26 | -3.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.57 | 20.19 | -14.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TPYP | ION | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 3.21 | -1.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.37 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between TPYP and ION is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TPYP vs. ION - Dividend Comparison
TPYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than ION's 1.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 3.23% | 3.91% | 3.95% | 4.83% | 4.48% | 4.86% | 6.14% | 4.45% | 4.58% | 3.71% | 3.49% | 2.56% |
ION Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF | 1.46% | 1.63% | 1.74% | 2.23% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TPYP vs. ION - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPYP drawdown since its inception was -51.91%, roughly equal to the maximum ION drawdown of -52.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPYP and ION.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPYP | ION | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.91% | -52.08% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.17% | -23.30% | +10.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.65% | -13.04% | +11.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.97% | -24.61% | +16.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 6.07% | -2.30% |
Volatility
TPYP vs. ION - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) is 3.19%, while Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) has a volatility of 15.13%. This indicates that TPYP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ION based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TPYP | ION | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 15.13% | -11.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.94% | 30.44% | -21.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.59% | 39.07% | -22.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.32% | 30.74% | -13.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 30.74% | -8.78% |