TPYAX vs. FHLFX
TPYAX (Touchstone International ESG Equity Fund) and FHLFX (Fidelity Series International Index Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, TPYAX returned 2.92%/yr vs 9.55%/yr for FHLFX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TPYAX charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FHLFX.
Performance
TPYAX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPYAX achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than FHLFX's 10.85% return.
TPYAX
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- 6M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 1Y
- -6.68%
- 3Y*
- 7.73%
- 5Y*
- 2.92%
- 10Y*
- 9.27%
FHLFX
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 7.10%
- YTD
- 10.85%
- 1Y
- 23.03%
- 3Y*
- 16.16%
- 5Y*
- 9.55%
- 10Y*
- —
TPYAX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPYAX Touchstone International ESG Equity Fund | -0.23% | 9.60% | 8.17% | 23.62% | -20.81% | 10.68% | 12.71% | 60.58% | -12.80% |
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund | 10.85% | 31.96% | 3.67% | 18.16% | -14.17% | 11.23% | 8.09% | 21.66% | -10.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPYAX and FHLFX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018 | 0.87 |
The correlation between TPYAX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPYAX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank
TPYAX
FHLFX
TPYAX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone International ESG Equity Fund (TPYAX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TPYAX | FHLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.27 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 2.06 | -2.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | 7.67 | -8.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TPYAX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPYAX drawdown since its inception was -57.30%, which is greater than FHLFX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPYAX and FHLFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPYAX | FHLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.30% | -33.58% | -23.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.54% | -11.37% | -12.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.78% | -13.62% | -10.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.14% | -29.36% | -6.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.26% | -0.71% | -7.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.84% | -6.03% | -5.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.70% | 3.04% | +6.66% |
Volatility
TPYAX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison
Touchstone International ESG Equity Fund (TPYAX) has a higher volatility of 7.37% compared to Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) at 4.14%. This indicates that TPYAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPYAX | FHLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.37% | 4.14% | +3.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.33% | 13.10% | +4.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.12% | 15.51% | +4.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.40% | 16.10% | +3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.53% | 17.63% | +2.90% |
TPYAX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPYAX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPYAX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison
TPYAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than FHLFX's 3.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund | 3.12% | 3.46% | 2.98% | 2.86% | 2.60% | 2.47% | 1.92% | 1.95% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPYAX Touchstone International ESG Equity Fund | 1.06% | 1.06% | 10.22% | 4.12% | 2.32% | 7.13% | 0.34% | 46.57% | 12.62% | 4.31% | 2.46% | 10.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPYAX and FHLFX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TPYAX has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to FHLFX (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPYAX dropped -57.30% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.
FHLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TPYAX and FHLFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer