TPSC vs. RB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TPSC (Timothy Plan US Small Cap Core ETF) and RB (ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TPSC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Victory U.S. Small Cap Volatility Weighted BRI, while RB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Russell 2000. Both are passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TPSC charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for RB.

Performance

TPSC vs. RB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan US Small Cap Core ETF (TPSC) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPSC achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly higher than RB's 6.76% return.

TPSC

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 9.32%
• 6M: 8.70%
• 1Y: 20.18%
• 3Y*: 14.55%
• 5Y*: 7.07%
• 10Y*: —

RB

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 6.76%
• 6M: 8.48%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPSC vs. RB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TPSC Timothy Plan US Small Cap Core ETF	9.32%	7.93%
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	6.76%	10.58%

Correlation

The correlation between TPSC and RB is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	0.72

Return for Risk

TPSC vs. RB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPSC

TPSC Risk / Return Rank: 40
TPSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
TPSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
TPSC Omega Ratio Rank: 34
TPSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
TPSC Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPSC vs. RB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan US Small Cap Core ETF (TPSC) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TPSC	RB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.35	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TPSC	RB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.29	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	3.15	-2.70

Drawdowns

TPSC vs. RB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPSC drawdown since its inception was -41.79%, which is greater than RB's maximum drawdown of -1.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPSC and RB.

Drawdown Indicators

	TPSC	RB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.79%	-1.70%	-40.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.44%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.48%	-0.47%	-1.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.43%	-0.41%	-8.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TPSC	RB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.96%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.59%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.80%	6.21%	+9.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.90%	6.21%	+13.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.47%	6.21%	+18.26%

TPSC vs. RB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPSC has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than RB's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

TPSC vs. RB - Dividend Comparison

TPSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than RB's 2.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	2.00%	1.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TPSC Timothy Plan US Small Cap Core ETF	1.02%	1.07%	0.97%	1.06%	1.07%	1.12%	1.13%	0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TPSC and RB in my portfolio?

TPSC and RB have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TPSC or RB?

On fees, TPSC is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TPSC or RB?

TPSC is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for RB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TPSC or RB?

RB has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 1.02% for TPSC.

What is the main difference between TPSC and RB?

TPSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while RB is Defined Outcome. TPSC tracks Victory U.S. Small Cap Volatility Weighted BRI, while RB tracks Russell 2000. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for TPSC and 0.58% for RB.