TPSC vs. ASCE
TPSC (Timothy Plan US Small Cap Core ETF) and ASCE (Allspring SMID Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. TPSC is passively managed, while ASCE is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TPSC charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ASCE.
Performance
TPSC vs. ASCE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPSC achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly lower than ASCE's 22.25% return.
TPSC
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 9.32%
- 6M
- 8.70%
- 1Y
- 20.18%
- 3Y*
- 14.55%
- 5Y*
- 7.07%
- 10Y*
- —
ASCE
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 22.25%
- 6M
- 21.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TPSC vs. ASCE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TPSC Timothy Plan US Small Cap Core ETF | 9.32% | 4.81% |
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF | 22.25% | 8.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPSC and ASCE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPSC vs. ASCE — Risk / Return Rank
TPSC
ASCE
TPSC vs. ASCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan US Small Cap Core ETF (TPSC) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TPSC | ASCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.29 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.98 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.35 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TPSC | ASCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 1.92 | -1.46 |
Drawdowns
TPSC vs. ASCE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPSC drawdown since its inception was -41.79%, which is greater than ASCE's maximum drawdown of -9.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPSC and ASCE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPSC | ASCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.79% | -9.22% | -32.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -0.38% | -1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.43% | -2.10% | -6.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | — | — |
Volatility
TPSC vs. ASCE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPSC | ASCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.59% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.80% | 19.25% | -3.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 19.25% | +0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.47% | 19.25% | +5.22% |
TPSC vs. ASCE - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPSC has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than ASCE's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPSC vs. ASCE - Dividend Comparison
TPSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than ASCE's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF | 0.18% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPSC Timothy Plan US Small Cap Core ETF | 1.02% | 1.07% | 0.97% | 1.06% | 1.07% | 1.12% | 1.13% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPSC and ASCE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASCE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASCE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TPSC.
TPSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.18% for ASCE.
They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for TPSC and 0.38% for ASCE.
Find the right allocation for TPSC and ASCE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer