TPRF.TO vs. SDAY.NEO
TPRF.TO (TD Active Preferred Share ETF) and SDAY.NEO (Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Equity DayMAX™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TPRF.TO is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by TD, while SDAY.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital. Both are actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TPRF.TO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for SDAY.NEO.
Performance
TPRF.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPRF.TO achieves a 5.07% return, which is significantly lower than SDAY.NEO's 9.14% return.
TPRF.TO
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 5.07%
- 6M
- 6.46%
- 1Y
- 17.52%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.05%
- 10Y*
- —
SDAY.NEO
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- YTD
- 9.14%
- 6M
- 6.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TPRF.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TPRF.TO TD Active Preferred Share ETF | 5.07% | 7.61% |
SDAY.NEO Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Equity DayMAX™ ETF | 9.14% | 4.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPRF.TO and SDAY.NEO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPRF.TO vs. SDAY.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
TPRF.TO
SDAY.NEO
TPRF.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Active Preferred Share ETF (TPRF.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Equity DayMAX™ ETF (SDAY.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TPRF.TO | SDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.92 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.07 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 39.29 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TPRF.TO | SDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 1.39 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
TPRF.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPRF.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, which is greater than SDAY.NEO's maximum drawdown of -7.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPRF.TO and SDAY.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPRF.TO | SDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.12% | -7.75% | -35.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -1.27% | +0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.87% | -1.86% | -4.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.45% | — | — |
Volatility
TPRF.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPRF.TO | SDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.21% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.16% | 11.55% | -7.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.67% | 11.55% | -1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.41% | 11.55% | +3.86% |
TPRF.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPRF.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SDAY.NEO's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPRF.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Dividend Comparison
TPRF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, less than SDAY.NEO's 16.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDAY.NEO Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Equity DayMAX™ ETF | 16.28% | 8.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPRF.TO TD Active Preferred Share ETF | 4.50% | 4.36% | 4.56% | 5.74% | 10.25% | 8.28% | 10.46% | 9.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPRF.TO and SDAY.NEO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TPRF.TO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TPRF.TO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SDAY.NEO.
TPRF.TO is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while SDAY.NEO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: TD and Hamilton Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TPRF.TO and 0.85% for SDAY.NEO.
Find the right allocation for TPRF.TO and SDAY.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer