PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPRF.TO vs. CBIL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPRF.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Active Preferred Share ETF (TPRF.TO) and Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPRF.TO achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly higher than CBIL.TO's 1.12% return.


TPRF.TO

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.86%
6M
6.44%
YTD
6.95%
1Y
15.09%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
8.94%
10Y*

CBIL.TO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.18%
6M
1.08%
YTD
1.12%
1Y
2.31%
3Y*
3.54%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPRF.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TPRF.TO
TD Active Preferred Share ETF
6.95%18.21%28.67%3.90%
CBIL.TO
Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.12%2.68%4.47%3.36%

Correlation

The correlation between TPRF.TO and CBIL.TO is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2023

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPRF.TO vs. CBIL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPRF.TO
TPRF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
TPRF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPRF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPRF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
TPRF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPRF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

CBIL.TO
CBIL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CBIL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBIL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBIL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CBIL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBIL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPRF.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Active Preferred Share ETF (TPRF.TO) and Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TPRF.TOCBIL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-15.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.80

5.33

-3.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.09

58.06

-51.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

32.86

315.36

-282.50

TPRF.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPRF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.70, which is lower than the CBIL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 8.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPRF.TO and CBIL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TPRF.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPRF.TO drawdown since its inception was -44.80%, which is greater than CBIL.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPRF.TO and CBIL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPRF.TOCBIL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.80%

-0.06%

-44.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.49%

-0.04%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.39%

-0.06%

-8.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

0.00%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.52%

-0.00%

-7.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

0.01%

+0.45%

Volatility

TPRF.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Volatility Comparison

TD Active Preferred Share ETF (TPRF.TO) has a higher volatility of 0.93% compared to Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO) at 0.07%. This indicates that TPRF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBIL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPRF.TOCBIL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

0.07%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.63%

0.18%

+2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.10%

0.26%

+3.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.64%

0.32%

+9.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.24%

0.32%

+14.92%

TPRF.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPRF.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CBIL.TO's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPRF.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Dividend Comparison

TPRF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than CBIL.TO's 2.24% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CBIL.TO
Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF
2.24%2.58%4.38%3.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TPRF.TO
TD Active Preferred Share ETF
4.49%4.36%4.56%5.74%4.99%4.04%5.09%5.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


TPRF.TO and CBIL.TO have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBIL.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBIL.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TPRF.TO.

TPRF.TO is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while CBIL.TO is Canadian Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: TD and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TPRF.TO and 0.10% for CBIL.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPRF.TO and CBIL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer