TPLS vs. DCMT
TPLS (Thornburg Core Plus Bond ETF) and DCMT (DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TPLS is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Thornburg, while DCMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by DoubleLine. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TPLS returned 4.76% vs 39.57% for DCMT. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. TPLS charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DCMT.
Performance
TPLS vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPLS achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 32.24% return.
TPLS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 0.46%
- 1Y
- 4.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DCMT
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- -3.79%
- YTD
- 32.24%
- 6M
- 30.67%
- 1Y
- 39.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TPLS vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TPLS Thornburg Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.32% | 5.59% |
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF | 32.24% | 1.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPLS and DCMT is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025 | -0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPLS vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank
TPLS
DCMT
TPLS vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Core Plus Bond ETF (TPLS) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TPLS | DCMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.38 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 6.41 | -4.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.48 | 15.18 | -10.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TPLS | DCMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 2.17 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 1.15 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
TPLS vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPLS drawdown since its inception was -3.04%, smaller than the maximum DCMT drawdown of -11.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPLS and DCMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPLS | DCMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.04% | -11.95% | +8.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.04% | -6.21% | +3.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -5.08% | +3.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.90% | -3.14% | +2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 2.61% | -1.55% |
Volatility
TPLS vs. DCMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Thornburg Core Plus Bond ETF (TPLS) is 1.24%, while DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that TPLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPLS | DCMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.24% | 6.86% | -5.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.75% | 15.96% | -13.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.93% | 18.36% | -14.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.53% | 15.79% | -11.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.53% | 15.79% | -11.26% |
TPLS vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPLS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPLS vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison
TPLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than DCMT's 2.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF | 2.78% | 3.67% | 1.59% |
TPLS Thornburg Core Plus Bond ETF | 4.61% | 4.28% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPLS and DCMT have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DCMT has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to TPLS (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPLS dropped -3.04% vs DCMT's -11.95%.
On 1-year performance, DCMT leads with 39.57% vs 4.76% for TPLS. On fees, TPLS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, TPLS has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DCMT has performed better with a 39.57% return vs 4.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TPLS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DCMT.
TPLS has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 2.78% for DCMT.
TPLS is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while DCMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Thornburg and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for TPLS and 0.66% for DCMT.
DCMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TPLS and DCMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer