PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPLNX vs. DFSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPLNX vs. DFSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan Small Cap Value Fund (TPLNX) and DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPLNX achieves a 8.11% return, which is significantly lower than DFSCX's 16.17% return. Over the past 10 years, TPLNX has underperformed DFSCX with an annualized return of 9.01%, while DFSCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.13% annualized return.


TPLNX

1D
-0.76%
1M
-2.49%
YTD
8.11%
6M
7.83%
1Y
16.24%
3Y*
11.27%
5Y*
4.75%
10Y*
9.01%

DFSCX

1D
0.08%
1M
1.25%
YTD
16.17%
6M
17.50%
1Y
36.71%
3Y*
17.48%
5Y*
8.84%
10Y*
11.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPLNX vs. DFSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TPLNX
Timothy Plan Small Cap Value Fund
8.11%0.58%11.18%17.31%-13.13%28.12%2.00%28.29%-15.66%12.94%
DFSCX
DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio
16.17%9.65%11.43%17.93%-12.49%33.70%6.61%20.68%-11.60%10.92%

Correlation

The correlation between TPLNX and DFSCX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 1994

0.92

The correlation between TPLNX and DFSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPLNX vs. DFSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPLNX
TPLNX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
TPLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
TPLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

DFSCX
DFSCX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
DFSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPLNX vs. DFSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Small Cap Value Fund (TPLNX) and DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TPLNXDFSCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.94

2.08

-1.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.53

3.02

-1.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.36

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

4.45

-2.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.14

14.38

-10.24

TPLNX vs. DFSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPLNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the DFSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPLNX and DFSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TPLNXDFSCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

2.08

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.42

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.49

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.61

-0.21

Drawdowns

TPLNX vs. DFSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPLNX drawdown since its inception was -55.96%, smaller than the maximum DFSCX drawdown of -63.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPLNX and DFSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPLNXDFSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.96%

-63.07%

+7.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.04%

-8.17%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.49%

-27.01%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.75%

-27.01%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.18%

-46.88%

+3.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.45%

-0.60%

-2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.73%

-9.91%

+1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.70%

2.53%

+1.17%

Volatility

TPLNX vs. DFSCX - Volatility Comparison

Timothy Plan Small Cap Value Fund (TPLNX) and DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX) have volatilities of 4.53% and 4.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPLNXDFSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

4.45%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.47%

11.58%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.97%

17.60%

-0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.53%

21.01%

-0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.13%

22.64%

-0.51%

TPLNX vs. DFSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPLNX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than DFSCX's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPLNX vs. DFSCX - Dividend Comparison

TPLNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, more than DFSCX's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSCX
DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio
0.83%1.03%0.97%2.48%5.16%10.77%0.87%2.80%5.50%5.05%0.90%6.33%
TPLNX
Timothy Plan Small Cap Value Fund
4.78%5.17%12.41%3.95%6.72%9.40%0.16%3.68%16.26%9.20%1.34%9.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, TPLNX and DFSCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TPLNX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to DFSCX (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPLNX dropped -55.96% vs DFSCX's -63.07%.

DFSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPLNX and DFSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer