TPLC vs. TMFM

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

TPLC (Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund) and TMFM (Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. TPLC is passively managed, while TMFM is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TPLC returned 12.44%/yr vs 2.09%/yr for TMFM. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TPLC charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for TMFM.

Performance

TPLC vs. TMFM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) and Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPLC achieves a 11.40% return, which is significantly higher than TMFM's -6.90% return.

TPLC

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 1.38%
• 6M: 7.47%
• YTD: 11.40%
• 1Y: 12.08%
• 3Y*: 12.44%
• 5Y*: 8.51%
• 10Y*: —

TMFM

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 2.46%
• 6M: -10.09%
• YTD: -6.90%
• 1Y: -16.65%
• 3Y*: 2.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPLC vs. TMFM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TPLC Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund	11.40%	7.08%	13.10%	15.17%	-12.58%	2.68%
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF	-6.90%	-8.98%	17.54%	21.81%	-27.36%	1.91%

Correlation

The correlation between TPLC and TMFM is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2021	0.85

The correlation between TPLC and TMFM shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TPLC vs. TMFM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TPLC	TMFM
Industrials	22.6%	20.2%
Technology	19.0%	31.7%
Financial Services	11.6%	13.6%
Utilities	11.0%	-
Healthcare	9.5%	24.2%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	3.4%
Energy	7.6%	-
Basic Materials	6.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	2.3%
Communication Services	0.3%	-
Real Estate	0.2%	4.6%

Return for Risk

TPLC vs. TMFM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPLC

TPLC Risk / Return Rank: 38
TPLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
TPLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
TPLC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
TPLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
TPLC Martin Ratio Rank: 44

TMFM

TMFM Risk / Return Rank: 3
TMFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
TMFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
TMFM Omega Ratio Rank: 3
TMFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
TMFM Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPLC vs. TMFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) and Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TPLC	TMFM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	-0.88	+1.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	-1.22	+2.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	0.87	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.60	-0.63	+2.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.69	-1.09	+6.78

TPLC vs. TMFM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is higher than the TMFM Sharpe Ratio of -0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPLC and TMFM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TPLC vs. TMFM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPLC drawdown since its inception was -38.02%, which is greater than TMFM's maximum drawdown of -31.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPLC and TMFM.

Drawdown Indicators

	TPLC	TMFM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.02%	-31.75%	-6.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.58%	-26.59%	+19.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.18%	-31.75%	+13.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.54%	-24.24%	+23.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.23%	-16.05%	+10.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	15.34%	-13.21%

Volatility

TPLC vs. TMFM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) is 2.71%, while Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that TPLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TPLC	TMFM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.71%	5.37%	-2.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.46%	15.91%	-7.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.64%	19.13%	-7.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.14%	20.57%	-4.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.79%	20.57%	-0.78%

TPLC vs. TMFM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPLC has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than TMFM's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

TPLC vs. TMFM - Dividend Comparison

TPLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than TMFM's 0.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.07%	0.06%	16.27%	2.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TPLC Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund	0.83%	0.89%	0.88%	0.89%	1.06%	0.61%	0.81%	0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TPLC and TMFM in my portfolio?

TPLC and TMFM have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TPLC or TMFM?

TMFM has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to TPLC (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPLC dropped -38.02% vs TMFM's -31.75%.

Which ETF is better, TPLC or TMFM?

On 3-year performance, TPLC leads with 12.44% vs 2.09% for TMFM. On fees, TPLC is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, TPLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TPLC or TMFM?

Over the 3-year period, TPLC has performed better with a 12.44% return vs 2.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TPLC or TMFM?

TPLC is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TPLC or TMFM?

TPLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.07% for TMFM.

What is the main difference between TPLC and TMFM?

They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and Motley Fool. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for TPLC and 0.85% for TMFM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TPLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.