PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPLC vs. QQQN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPLC vs. QQQN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TPLC

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.50%
6M
7.18%
YTD
11.20%
1Y
13.26%
3Y*
11.85%
5Y*
7.98%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.96%

QQQN

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$634.79K$704.66K$1.85M

TPLC vs. QQQN - Yearly Performance Comparison


TPLC vs. QQQN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TPLC
QQQN

Industrials

23.4%
8.7%

Technology

18.6%
47.3%

Financial Services

11.5%

-

Utilities

11.2%
1.6%

Healthcare

9.6%
19.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
13.7%

Energy

7.2%

-

Basic Materials

5.7%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
1.4%

Communication Services

0.2%
5.5%

Real Estate

0.2%

-

Industrials

TPLC
23.4%
QQQN
8.7%

Technology

TPLC
18.6%
QQQN
47.3%

Financial Services

TPLC
11.5%
QQQN

-

Utilities

TPLC
11.2%
QQQN
1.6%

Healthcare

TPLC
9.6%
QQQN
19.9%

Consumer Cyclical

TPLC
8.8%
QQQN
13.7%

Energy

TPLC
7.2%
QQQN

-

Basic Materials

TPLC
5.7%
QQQN
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

TPLC
3.6%
QQQN
1.4%

Communication Services

TPLC
0.2%
QQQN
5.5%

Real Estate

TPLC
0.2%
QQQN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPLC vs. QQQN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TPLC
TPLC Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
TPLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPLC Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TPLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPLC Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TPLC vs. QQQN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TPLCQQQNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.75

TPLC vs. QQQN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TPLC vs. QQQN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPLC drawdown since its inception was -38.02%, which is greater than QQQN's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPLC and QQQN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPLCQQQNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.02%

0.00%

-38.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

0.00%

-1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

0.00%

-5.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

Volatility

TPLC vs. QQQN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPLCQQQNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.58%

0.00%

+11.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.12%

0.00%

+16.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.73%

0.00%

+19.73%

TPLC vs. QQQN - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPLC has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQN's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPLC vs. QQQN - Dividend Comparison

TPLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, while QQQN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
QQQN
VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TPLC
Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund
0.83%0.89%0.88%0.89%1.06%0.61%0.81%0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, QQQN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TPLC.

TPLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.00% for QQQN.

TPLC tracks Victory U.S. Large Cap Volatility Weighted BRI Index, while QQQN tracks Nasdaq Q-50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for TPLC and 0.18% for QQQN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPLC and QQQN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer