PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPLC vs. QQJG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TPLC vs. QQJG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TPLC vs. QQJG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TPLC
Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund
2.76%7.08%13.10%15.17%-12.58%6.31%
QQJG
Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
1.44%18.05%14.67%17.20%-27.69%0.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPLC achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly higher than QQJG's 1.44% return.


TPLC

1D
0.39%
1M
-5.39%
YTD
2.76%
6M
1.12%
1Y
10.30%
3Y*
11.64%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*

QQJG

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.44%
6M
3.25%
1Y
27.88%
3Y*
14.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TPLC vs. QQJG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPLC has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than QQJG's 0.20% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TPLC vs. QQJG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPLC
TPLC Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
TPLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPLC Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
TPLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPLC Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

QQJG
QQJG Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
QQJG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQJG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQJG Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QQJG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQJG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPLC vs. QQJG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TPLCQQJGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.61

1.30

-0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.98

1.90

-0.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.29

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

1.73

-0.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.90

8.45

-4.55

TPLC vs. QQJG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPLC Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the QQJG Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPLC and QQJG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TPLCQQJGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

1.30

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.17

+0.36

Correlation

The correlation between TPLC and QQJG is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TPLC vs. QQJG - Dividend Comparison

TPLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than QQJG's 13.86% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
TPLC
Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund
0.89%0.89%0.88%0.89%1.06%0.61%0.81%0.67%
QQJG
Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
13.86%0.68%0.65%0.54%0.70%0.08%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TPLC vs. QQJG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPLC drawdown since its inception was -38.02%, roughly equal to the maximum QQJG drawdown of -36.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPLC and QQJG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TPLCQQJGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.02%

-36.76%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.42%

-14.51%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.39%

-2.09%

-3.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-15.84%

+10.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

2.97%

-0.19%

Volatility

TPLC vs. QQJG - Volatility Comparison

Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG) at 0.00%. This indicates that TPLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQJG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TPLCQQJGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

0.00%

+4.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.79%

11.78%

-2.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.90%

21.80%

-4.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

22.12%

-5.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.06%

22.12%

-2.06%