TPLC vs. BBHM
TPLC (Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund) and BBHM (BBH Select Mid Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - TPLC tracks the Victory U.S. Large Cap Volatility Weighted BRI Index while BBHM tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TPLC charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for BBHM.
Performance
TPLC vs. BBHM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPLC achieves a 8.78% return, which is significantly higher than BBHM's 1.78% return.
TPLC
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 8.78%
- 6M
- 7.78%
- 1Y
- 12.59%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 8.22%
- 10Y*
- —
BBHM
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- -0.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TPLC vs. BBHM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TPLC Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund | 8.78% | 1.97% |
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF | 1.78% | 2.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPLC and BBHM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPLC vs. BBHM — Risk / Return Rank
TPLC
BBHM
TPLC vs. BBHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) and BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TPLC | BBHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.94 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TPLC | BBHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.50 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
TPLC vs. BBHM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPLC drawdown since its inception was -38.02%, which is greater than BBHM's maximum drawdown of -9.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPLC and BBHM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPLC | BBHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.02% | -9.78% | -28.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -5.28% | +5.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.29% | -2.71% | -2.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | — | — |
Volatility
TPLC vs. BBHM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPLC | BBHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.70% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.45% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.50% | 17.46% | -5.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 17.46% | -1.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.89% | 17.46% | +2.43% |
TPLC vs. BBHM - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPLC has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than BBHM's 0.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPLC vs. BBHM - Dividend Comparison
TPLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, while BBHM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPLC Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund | 0.84% | 0.89% | 0.88% | 0.89% | 1.06% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 0.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPLC and BBHM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TPLC is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TPLC is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BBHM.
TPLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.00% for BBHM.
TPLC tracks Victory U.S. Large Cap Volatility Weighted BRI Index, while BBHM tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and BBH. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for TPLC and 0.81% for BBHM.
Find the right allocation for TPLC and BBHM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer