TPINX vs. FGBRX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TPINX (Templeton Global Bond Fund) and FGBRX (Templeton Global Bond Fund - Class R) are both Global Bonds funds from Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, TPINX returned 0.22%/yr vs -0.02%/yr for FGBRX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TPINX charges 0.94%/yr vs 1.24%/yr for FGBRX.

Performance

TPINX vs. FGBRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Templeton Global Bond Fund (TPINX) and Templeton Global Bond Fund - Class R (FGBRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPINX achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly higher than FGBRX's 1.34% return. Over the past 10 years, TPINX has outperformed FGBRX with an annualized return of 0.22%, while FGBRX has yielded a comparatively lower -0.02% annualized return.

TPINX

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: -0.53%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 6M: 1.49%
• 1Y: 5.59%
• 3Y*: 2.09%
• 5Y*: -1.02%
• 10Y*: 0.22%

FGBRX

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: -0.55%
• YTD: 1.34%
• 6M: 1.39%
• 1Y: 5.35%
• 3Y*: 1.86%
• 5Y*: -1.25%
• 10Y*: -0.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPINX vs. FGBRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TPINX Templeton Global Bond Fund	1.43%	15.02%	-11.95%	2.45%	-6.17%	-5.06%	-4.41%	0.63%	1.26%	2.36%
FGBRX Templeton Global Bond Fund - Class R	1.34%	14.81%	-12.18%	2.18%	-6.40%	-5.30%	-4.65%	0.38%	1.01%	2.10%

Correlation

The correlation between TPINX and FGBRX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	1.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2009	0.99

The correlation between TPINX and FGBRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TPINX vs. FGBRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPINX

TPINX Risk / Return Rank: 11
TPINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
TPINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
TPINX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
TPINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
TPINX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

FGBRX

FGBRX Risk / Return Rank: 10
FGBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
FGBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
FGBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
FGBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
FGBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPINX vs. FGBRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Global Bond Fund (TPINX) and Templeton Global Bond Fund - Class R (FGBRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TPINX	FGBRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	0.80	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	1.18	+0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.15	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.98	0.91	+0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.19	2.96	+0.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TPINX vs. FGBRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPINX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the FGBRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPINX and FGBRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TPINX	FGBRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86	0.80	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.13	-0.15	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.03	-0.00	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.22	+0.55

Drawdowns

TPINX vs. FGBRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPINX drawdown since its inception was -26.45%, roughly equal to the maximum FGBRX drawdown of -27.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPINX and FGBRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TPINX	FGBRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.45%	-27.46%	+1.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.36%	-6.38%	+0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.03%	-13.09%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.15%	-19.87%	+0.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.45%	-27.46%	+1.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.66%	-15.07%	+1.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.84%	-8.36%	+3.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.94%	1.96%	-0.02%

Volatility

TPINX vs. FGBRX - Volatility Comparison

Templeton Global Bond Fund (TPINX) and Templeton Global Bond Fund - Class R (FGBRX) have volatilities of 2.23% and 2.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TPINX	FGBRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.23%	2.20%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.97%	5.97%	0.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.25%	7.27%	-0.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.13%	8.14%	-0.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.27%	7.28%	-0.01%

TPINX vs. FGBRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPINX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than FGBRX's 1.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

TPINX vs. FGBRX - Dividend Comparison

TPINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, more than FGBRX's 4.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGBRX Templeton Global Bond Fund - Class R	4.83%	4.10%	5.49%	3.61%	4.92%	5.11%	4.34%	5.86%	6.27%	3.08%	2.10%	2.85%
TPINX Templeton Global Bond Fund	5.06%	4.29%	5.77%	3.87%	5.17%	5.38%	4.59%	6.12%	6.53%	3.34%	2.33%	3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TPINX and FGBRX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, TPINX and FGBRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TPINX or FGBRX?

TPINX has higher volatility (2.23%) compared to FGBRX (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPINX dropped -26.45% vs FGBRX's -27.46%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TPINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.