TPIF vs. ACLO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TPIF (Timothy Plan International ETF) and ACLO (TCW AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TPIF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Victory International Volatility Weighted BRI Index, while ACLO is a CLO fund actively managed by TCW. TPIF is passively managed, while ACLO is actively managed. Over the past year, TPIF returned 23.54% vs 5.31% for ACLO. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. TPIF charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACLO.

Performance

TPIF vs. ACLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPIF achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly higher than ACLO's 2.41% return.

TPIF

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: 10.38%
• 6M: 10.41%
• 1Y: 23.54%
• 3Y*: 18.44%
• 5Y*: 8.17%
• 10Y*: —

ACLO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 2.41%
• 6M: 2.53%
• 1Y: 5.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPIF vs. ACLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TPIF Timothy Plan International ETF	10.38%	34.34%	-0.79%
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	2.41%	5.32%	0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between TPIF and ACLO is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2024	-0.08

Return for Risk

TPIF vs. ACLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPIF

TPIF Risk / Return Rank: 50
TPIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
TPIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
TPIF Omega Ratio Rank: 50
TPIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
TPIF Martin Ratio Rank: 54

ACLO

ACLO Risk / Return Rank: 99
ACLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPIF vs. ACLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TPIF	ACLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	7.32	-5.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	15.16	-12.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	3.44	-2.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	19.90	-17.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.94	165.46	-156.52

TPIF vs. ACLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPIF Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is lower than the ACLO Sharpe Ratio of 7.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPIF and ACLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TPIF vs. ACLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPIF drawdown since its inception was -34.02%, which is greater than ACLO's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPIF and ACLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	TPIF	ACLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.02%	-1.01%	-33.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.19%	-0.27%	-9.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.14%	0.00%	-1.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.91%	-0.04%	-7.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	0.03%	+2.61%

Volatility

TPIF vs. ACLO - Volatility Comparison

Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) at 0.19%. This indicates that TPIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TPIF	ACLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.66%	0.19%	+4.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.14%	0.58%	+11.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.16%	0.73%	+13.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.74%	1.07%	+14.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.29%	1.07%	+17.22%

TPIF vs. ACLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPIF has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than ACLO's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

TPIF vs. ACLO - Dividend Comparison

TPIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than ACLO's 4.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	4.90%	4.87%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TPIF Timothy Plan International ETF	2.67%	2.65%	2.98%	2.40%	2.58%	2.38%	1.72%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TPIF and ACLO in my portfolio?

TPIF and ACLO have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TPIF or ACLO?

TPIF has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to ACLO (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPIF dropped -34.02% vs ACLO's -1.01%.

Which ETF is better, TPIF or ACLO?

On 1-year performance, TPIF leads with 23.54% vs 5.31% for ACLO. On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TPIF or ACLO?

Over the 1-year period, TPIF has performed better with a 23.54% return vs 5.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TPIF or ACLO?

ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for TPIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TPIF or ACLO?

ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 2.67% for TPIF.

What is the main difference between TPIF and ACLO?

TPIF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ACLO is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for TPIF and 0.20% for ACLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.32 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.