TPFC vs. VTV
TPFC (Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - TPFC tracks the Victory Free Cash Flow BRI Index while VTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TPFC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.
Performance
TPFC vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TPFC
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTV
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 11.18%
- YTD
- 15.07%
- 1Y
- 26.09%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 12.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.33%
TPFC vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TPFC Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.32% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 6.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPFC and VTV is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPFC vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
TPFC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VTV
TPFC vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF (TPFC) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TPFC | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.46 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.13 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.65 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TPFC vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPFC drawdown since its inception was -5.82%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPFC and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPFC | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | -59.27% | +53.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.13% | -0.95% | -2.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.47% | -7.83% | +5.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.67% | — |
Volatility
TPFC vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPFC | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.45% | 10.38% | +4.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 13.86% | +0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 16.61% | -2.16% |
TPFC vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPFC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPFC vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
TPFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than VTV's 1.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPFC Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.88% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPFC and VTV have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TPFC.
VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.13% for TPFC.
TPFC tracks Victory Free Cash Flow BRI Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TPFC and 0.04% for VTV.
Find the right allocation for TPFC and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer