TPFC vs. BGIG
TPFC (Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF) and BGIG (Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. TPFC is passively managed, while BGIG is actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TPFC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BGIG.
Performance
TPFC vs. BGIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TPFC
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BGIG
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 9.47%
- YTD
- 11.59%
- 1Y
- 19.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TPFC vs. BGIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TPFC Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.32% |
BGIG Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF | 3.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPFC and BGIG is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPFC vs. BGIG — Risk / Return Rank
TPFC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BGIG
TPFC vs. BGIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF (TPFC) and Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TPFC | BGIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.42 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.20 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TPFC vs. BGIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPFC drawdown since its inception was -5.82%, smaller than the maximum BGIG drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPFC and BGIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPFC | BGIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | -13.24% | +7.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.13% | -1.20% | -1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.47% | -1.72% | -0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.50% | — |
Volatility
TPFC vs. BGIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPFC | BGIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.45% | 8.98% | +5.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 11.81% | +2.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 11.81% | +2.64% |
TPFC vs. BGIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPFC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than BGIG's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPFC vs. BGIG - Dividend Comparison
TPFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than BGIG's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BGIG Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF | 1.72% | 1.89% | 2.02% | 0.78% |
TPFC Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPFC and BGIG have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BGIG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BGIG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TPFC.
BGIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.13% for TPFC.
They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and Bahl & Gaynor. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TPFC and 0.45% for BGIG.
Find the right allocation for TPFC and BGIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer