TPDIX vs. QDSNX
TPDIX (Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund Class I) and QDSNX (AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TPDIX returned 8.45%/yr vs 11.01%/yr for QDSNX. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TPDIX charges 1.09%/yr vs 3.30%/yr for QDSNX.
Performance
TPDIX vs. QDSNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPDIX achieves a 8.48% return, which is significantly higher than QDSNX's 5.37% return.
TPDIX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 8.48%
- 1Y
- 22.04%
- 3Y*
- 13.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.45%
- 10Y*
- 6.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.70%
QDSNX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- 6M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 5.37%
- 1Y
- 13.58%
- 3Y*
- 11.97%
- 5Y*
- 11.01%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
TPDIX vs. QDSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPDIX Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund Class I | 8.48% | 24.23% | 5.55% | 8.07% | -5.48% | 12.45% | 9.20% |
QDSNX AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N | 5.37% | 16.14% | 9.56% | 8.62% | 14.48% | 10.35% | 5.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPDIX and QDSNX is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2020 | 0.23 |
The correlation between TPDIX and QDSNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (5 years) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPDIX vs. QDSNX — Risk / Return Rank
TPDIX
QDSNX
TPDIX vs. QDSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund Class I (TPDIX) and AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N (QDSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TPDIX | QDSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.45 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 4.13 | -1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.68 | 13.52 | -6.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TPDIX vs. QDSNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPDIX drawdown since its inception was -22.26%, which is greater than QDSNX's maximum drawdown of -7.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPDIX and QDSNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPDIX | QDSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.26% | -7.15% | -15.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.03% | -3.10% | -4.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.03% | -6.93% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.43% | -7.15% | -10.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.73% | -0.94% | -4.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -1.46% | -2.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 0.94% | +2.38% |
Volatility
TPDIX vs. QDSNX - Volatility Comparison
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund Class I (TPDIX) has a higher volatility of 2.23% compared to AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N (QDSNX) at 1.86%. This indicates that TPDIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPDIX | QDSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.23% | 1.86% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.56% | 3.96% | +5.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.67% | 5.33% | +6.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.26% | 7.63% | +2.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.97% | 7.29% | +2.68% |
TPDIX vs. QDSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPDIX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QDSNX's 3.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPDIX vs. QDSNX - Dividend Comparison
TPDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than QDSNX's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDSNX AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N | 1.89% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 11.18% | 8.01% | 5.99% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPDIX Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund Class I | 0.94% | 1.02% | 3.02% | 2.61% | 4.73% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 3.18% | 3.02% | 0.41% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPDIX and QDSNX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TPDIX has higher volatility (2.23%) compared to QDSNX (1.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPDIX dropped -22.26% vs QDSNX's -7.15%.
QDSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TPDIX and QDSNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer